Hans,
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:14 PM, der.hans wrote:
> Am 16. Jun, 2013 schwätzte Nathan England so:
>
> moin moin,
>
> This is seriously rediculous! Why did a question about KDE become Off
>> Topic?
>> Was this an accident? Was this intentional?
>>
>
> Ryan set OT for his response to your qu
On Sun 16 June 2013 20:40:51 Matt Graham wrote:
> ...I'm not sure why the OT thing happened, but I don't have a ~/.kde/env/
> dir here. I've been using KDE since KDE 1 in 1999. On my Gentoo install,
> at least, the search path for the minicli is apparently taken from $PATH,
> which is set in ~/.b
On Sunday, June 16, 2013 09:14:01 PM der.hans wrote:
>
> > This is seriously rediculous! Why did a question about KDE become Off
> > Topic? Was this an accident? Was this intentional?
>
>
> Now my dilemma, do I fix that tag syntax to be TO: since the thread
> wandered off to off-topic or leave t
Am 16. Jun, 2013 schwätzte Nathan England so:
moin moin,
This is seriously rediculous! Why did a question about KDE become Off Topic?
Was this an accident? Was this intentional?
Ryan set OT for his response to your question about CotS. That was a good
move by him as that part of the thread ha
From: Nathan England
> Why did a question about KDE become Off Topic?
KDE has become an undesktop-environment. All doubleplusgood citizens are
running GNOME or Unity according to The Computer. You trust The Computer,
don't you?
...I'm not sure why the OT thing happened, but I don't have a ~/.
On Sunday, June 16, 2013 08:05:53 PM Ryan Rix wrote:
> We're only allowed to talk about the kernel itself here now...
>
> On Sun 16 June 2013 18:21:16 Nathan England wrote:
> > This is seriously rediculous! Why did a question about KDE become Off
> > Topic? Was this an accident? Was this intention
how about if it is related to open source technology it is on topic?
:-)~MIKE~(-:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Ryan Rix wrote:
> We're only allowed to talk about the kernel itself here now...
>
> On Sun 16 June 2013 18:21:16 Nathan England wrote:
> > This is seriously rediculous! Why did a
We're only allowed to talk about the kernel itself here now...
On Sun 16 June 2013 18:21:16 Nathan England wrote:
> This is seriously rediculous! Why did a question about KDE become Off Topic?
> Was this an accident? Was this intentional?
>
> Was it just to test the new OT: fliters?
>
>
> -
This is seriously rediculous! Why did a question about KDE become Off Topic?
Was this an accident? Was this intentional?
Was it just to test the new OT: fliters?
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubs
Brian,
This is a really nice solution, Brian! Suite!
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Brian Cluff wrote:
> I noticed you added OT to this subject just after I sent the message about
> how to filter out off topic messages.
> If you were trying to send a test message with an off topic trigger, i
I noticed you added OT to this subject just after I sent the message
about how to filter out off topic messages.
If you were trying to send a test message with an off topic trigger, it
requires the colon in order to work. (OT:)
Brian Cluff
On 06/15/2013 11:25 AM, Ryan Rix wrote:
One doesn't g
One doesn't gain slack by following the rules of society, Nathan :)
On Fri 14 June 2013 14:28:44 Nathan England wrote:
> Hey, aren't you a fedora guy? What's with the Head of the Church of the
> Subgenius? Isn't that a Slackware thing? Have you crossed over into the
> light?
>
> On Friday, June 1
12 matches
Mail list logo
