PFA: home computers have no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

2016-07-10 Thread Tom Roche
Apologies to those who've already seen this, but it was news to me: Last month (Jun 2016), federal district judge Henry Coke Morgan, Jr[1] ruled that the Fourth Amendment[2] does not protect home computers. A criminal defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding an in-home pers

Re: PFA: home computers have no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

2016-07-11 Thread der.hans
Am 10. Jul, 2016 schwätzte Tom Roche so: moin moin, privacy is overrated, we should just mandate making all home walls out of glass. Maybe it's time to notch up the desktop security series to be a desktop hardening series. ciao, der.hans Apologies to those who've already seen this, but it w

Re: PFA: home computers have no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

2016-07-11 Thread Eric Oyen
good lucl getting a password out of me. If I had the option like I do on the iPhone, I could set it up so that so many retries would erase the system. Most machines today have the TPM unit on board, so that can be used. With enough security in place, hacking or cracking just ceases to be worth t

Re: PFA: home computers have no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

2016-07-12 Thread David Schwartz
It would appear that the defendant in this case is basically arguing Heisenburg’s Uncertainty Principle is at play, in that the use of a trojan to identify and spy on his machine may have resulted in the files they found there to have come from unspecified sources, just because the trojan was pu

Re: PFA: home computers have no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

2016-07-12 Thread Tom Roche
summary: desktop hardening, ¡sí! punting online privacy, ¡no! details: David Schwartz[1] >> It would appear that the defendant in this case is basically arguing >> Heisenburg's Uncertainty Principle is at play, in that the use of a trojan >> to identify and spy on his machine may have resulted

Re: PFA: home computers have no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

2016-07-12 Thread Keith Smith
I read it to be akin to not locking your front door so when the cops come a calling they are legally able to walk in and search. Not so today. The 4th Amendment still protects you from that (you leaving your door unlocked). They were talking about a computer. Used to be your rights stoppe

Re: PFA: home computers have no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

2016-07-12 Thread Carl Parrish
Anyone have sources on hardening a pixel? Can you auto encrypt data on Google’s cloud? is it easy to make S3 a default drive? Have we ever done a workshop about using Crouton or chrubuntu on a pixel? Since about 85% of all I do is web work or ssh into a Linux server I really think I can get awa

Re: PFA: home computers have no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

2016-07-13 Thread Eric Oyen
well, I would recommend the use of pwgen and Ccrypt as interim measures. one can generate passwords of a very high order strength with one and encrypt files and folders (and even drive images) with the other. Nothing like good old fashioned command line tools to offer security. :) -eric of the