Re: ffmpeg on ?

2007-06-24 Thread KevinO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Your main problem is not knowing/understanding package management for your distribution. Since I am well familiar with Mandrake, I'll present a few of the basics, in a (small) nutshell. Urpmi is the tool to use to install and update software on a Mand

Re: 7z on LINUX

2007-06-24 Thread Vaughn Treude
Shawn Dowler wrote: > 2007/6/24, Vaughn Treude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> KevinO wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Vaughn Treude wrote: Hello all: I recently had the misfortune to download an archive with 7z format. I can't find anything that does tha

Re: ffmpeg on ?

2007-06-24 Thread Vaughn Treude
KevinO wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Vaughn Treude wrote: >>> Thanks for the offer, but it's not urgent. I'm just frustrated because >>> I'm trying to get ffmpeg set up on this system, and I've been running >>> into one roadblock after another... > What distributi

Re: Fwd: Debian package version

2007-06-24 Thread Carl Parrish
Thanks guys On 6/24/07, JT Moree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 JT Moree wrote: > Carl Parrish wrote: >>> On a rpm based system I know how to do what I want done is to type. >>> rpm -q >>> >>> How do I do the same thing on a Debian based distro? >>> I

Re: 7z on LINUX

2007-06-24 Thread Shawn Dowler
2007/6/24, Vaughn Treude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > KevinO wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Vaughn Treude wrote: > >> Hello all: > >> I recently had the misfortune to download an archive with 7z format. I > >> can't find anything that does that sort of decompression

Re: ffmpeg on ?

2007-06-24 Thread KevinO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vaughn Treude wrote: >> Thanks for the offer, but it's not urgent. I'm just frustrated because >> I'm trying to get ffmpeg set up on this system, and I've been running >> into one roadblock after another... > What distribution are you running? Ins

Re: 7z on LINUX

2007-06-24 Thread Michael Minor
On 6/24/07, Vaughn Treude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all: > I recently had the misfortune to download an archive with 7z format. I > can't find anything that does that sort of decompression in Linux. On > 7zip's source-forge page, there's some nonsense about using Wine to run > their Wind

Re: PLUG-discuss Digest, Vol 24, Issue 58

2007-06-24 Thread James crawford
> > Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 16:48:54 -0700 From: KevinO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: 7z on LINUX To: Main PLUG discussion list > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; > charset=ISO-8859-1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Vaughn Treude wrote: >> > Hell

Re: 7z on LINUX

2007-06-24 Thread Vaughn Treude
KevinO wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Vaughn Treude wrote: >> Hello all: >> I recently had the misfortune to download an archive with 7z format. I >> can't find anything that does that sort of decompression in Linux. On >> 7zip's source-forge page, there's some no

Re: Internet woes

2007-06-24 Thread Kenneth
--- "Robert N. Eaton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In Fedora 7 Thunderbird doesn't connect at all: it times out. Firefox > connects to a very few sites and doesn't seem to finish the connection, > no matter how long it tries. Seems like a software problem, but _which_ > software? SELinux? Fire

Re: 7z on LINUX

2007-06-24 Thread KevinO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vaughn Treude wrote: > Hello all: > I recently had the misfortune to download an archive with 7z format. I > can't find anything that does that sort of decompression in Linux. On > 7zip's source-forge page, there's some nonsense about using Wine to

7z on LINUX

2007-06-24 Thread Vaughn Treude
Hello all: I recently had the misfortune to download an archive with 7z format. I can't find anything that does that sort of decompression in Linux. On 7zip's source-forge page, there's some nonsense about using Wine to run their Windows version, but as far as I'm concerned, that's a ridiculou

Re: Fwd: Debian package version

2007-06-24 Thread JT Moree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 JT Moree wrote: > Carl Parrish wrote: >>> On a rpm based system I know how to do what I want done is to type. >>> rpm -q >>> >>> How do I do the same thing on a Debian based distro? >>> I just need to know the version that's installed. > > dpkg -l >

Re: Fwd: Debian package version

2007-06-24 Thread JT Moree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Carl Parrish wrote: > On a rpm based system I know how to do what I want done is to type. > rpm -q > > How do I do the same thing on a Debian based distro? > I just need to know the version that's installed. dpkg -l - -- JT Morée PC Xperience, Inc

Fwd: Debian package version

2007-06-24 Thread Carl Parrish
Sorry if this goes though all three times. But I think I figured out which email to use with this one. -- Forwarded message -- On a rpm based system I know how to do what I want done is to type. rpm -q How do I do the same thing on a Debian based distro? I just need to know the

Re: Cox

2007-06-24 Thread Jon M. Hanson
Have your tried calling Cox to see what's going on? In order to file a class action lawsuit you'd have to prove that this is a widespread activity and that probably would be very hard to prove. How do you check how the modem is configured? I'm on the 12 megabit service and I've never checked t

Re: Cox

2007-06-24 Thread Justin Mann
Erich Newell wrote: > A*holes are at it again. I pay for the premium service which is > supposed to be 9mbit down 1mbit up. I just checked the config on my > modem and its set to 5mbit down. > > I'm really tempted to start a class action lawsuit. Sure its in the > EULA that the bandwidth rates may

Re: DNS bind-9.3.3-8

2007-06-24 Thread slr
added the PTR records for both authoritative servers as well as my NAT address to the allow-query statement. now i get an authoritative answer from both servers. thanks for the advise. slr - Original Message - From: "slr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Main PLUG discussion list" Sent: Satu

Re: Internet woes

2007-06-24 Thread Robert N. Eaton
Robert N. Eaton wrote: > I'll buy a new memory stick and see if that makes a difference. > > Otherwise I'm frustrateder and baffleder than I was before, if that were > possible ;-). Just got back from Fry's, installed a gig of Corsair memory (an upgrade from 512 megs of no-name memory). Both W

Re: rsyc log weirdness

2007-06-24 Thread George Toft
Good thought! However, both systems were built the same, and have the same error messages depending on who is rsync'ing to whom. More details: These two servers are in a failover, high-availability cluster, and I use rsync to keep the file systems in sync. rsync syncs from the active node to

Re: Internet woes

2007-06-24 Thread Mike Hoy
> but I couldn't convince WinXP to burn a proper .iso image. > > If you want a very easy way to burn ISOS I'd recommend using ISORecorder for windows. http://isorecorder.alexfeinman.com/isorecorder.htm once you get it installed. Just right click on the iso and copy to cd. Easy. -

Re: Cox

2007-06-24 Thread Dazed_75
Sure, find a lawyer who is willing to take all the money the suit might garner and who thinks it has a chance. No one else will benefit from the suit though. Class actions seldom punish benefit anyone but the lawyers. Most seem to be settled and it seems deter little. Just my opinion of course.

Re: rsyc log weirdness

2007-06-24 Thread Dazed_75
On 6/24/07, George Toft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have an rsync cronjob that syncs up a couple of directories. It works fine. The problem is the logs are a combination of MST and UDT: Jun 24 09:22:01 server2 rsyncd[4670]: rsync to www/ from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (10.0.3.1) Jun 24 16:22:01 serv

rsyc log weirdness

2007-06-24 Thread George Toft
I have an rsync cronjob that syncs up a couple of directories. It works fine. The problem is the logs are a combination of MST and UDT: Jun 24 09:22:01 server2 rsyncd[4670]: rsync to www/ from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (10.0.3.1) Jun 24 16:22:01 server2 rsyncd[4670]: skipping non-regular file "html/s

Re: Cox

2007-06-24 Thread Erich Newell
A*holes are at it again. I pay for the premium service which is supposed to be 9mbit down 1mbit up. I just checked the config on my modem and its set to 5mbit down. I'm really tempted to start a class action lawsuit. Sure its in the EULA that the bandwidth rates may vary, but I doubt your average

Internet woes

2007-06-24 Thread Robert N. Eaton
I've been having trouble with email and accessing the net for some time now. Yesterday, my install of Fedora 7 (which didn't connect to the net) choked and refused to boot. I tried rescue disk, etc., but I couldn't revive it. I re-installed Fedora 7 for the fourth time, using the _customize now

Re: Cox

2007-06-24 Thread Robert N. Eaton
Justin Mann wrote: >> > Make sure that the modem is docsis 2.0 compliant. If the modem is not, > then you won't get the fastest speeds possible. What kind of surfboard > is it? Dunno about docsis compliance. Its a Motorola SB5120. I bought it about two years ago when my old cable modem

Re: Cox

2007-06-24 Thread Michael Havens
I got COX lite and it is fine. Never had COX full speed so I can't really compare. Hm Oh-yeah. They gave it to us free for a month annd I noticed no difference. On Saturday 23 June 2007 10:07 pm, Dan Lund wrote: > I did hear something about a cox "lite". > Heard about it a week or two ago

Re: Cox

2007-06-24 Thread Justin Mann
Alan Dayley wrote: Jon M. Hanson wrote: I've heard them advertise that on the local radio and/or TV stations. I didn't see anything on their website about it though. That's my question. The website doesn't show anything less than $45 a month. Alan ---

Re: Cox

2007-06-24 Thread Justin Mann
Robert N. Eaton wrote: I have a Motorola Surfboard that I used for years with Cox.net that's gathering dust in my office cupboard. Gimme a shout if you want it. Bob Eaton Jim wrote: Ok, I have seen what seems to be a smokin offer from Cox. $9.95 a month for the first six months and $14.9