Google's grandcentral might also be able to help with this. It's far more
limited, but just based on the features you requested, might be able to do
it.
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 12:03 PM, JD Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This can be achieved fairly easily using the new follow me features in
Ted Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 13:07 -0700, Nathan wrote:
Yeah, really, www.skype.org
If you'd like to go open source you can choose any SIP provider and use
Ekiga or Telepathy (or others)
--Ted
Ted's right. I've been using Ekiga with a
For anyone that is interested I found a nice article for IBM that talks
about the ext4 file system and show some of changes made in it.
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-ext4/?ca=dgr-lnxw01LinuxFSext4S_TACT=105AGX59S_CMP=GR
---
This is exactly what I am looking for. You say it is easy with FreePBX
huh. I would rather pay a service, but if we have to bring it in house
that is what we will do. Thanks, I will look into FreePBX.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
From what I can tell Grand Central is not really designed to do the many
many set. I would have to get an account for each setup and the
reliability is not great. I know several people who used and dropped
grand central for inbound calls because they would lose 5%-10% of their
calls.
House Passes PRO IP Bill
http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3i4552e786232dd91baa8a825cc2f79780
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.04279:
Oy...
Craig
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 11:42 -0700, Randy Melder wrote:
Will the President sign it?
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
House Passes PRO IP Bill
http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3i4552e786232dd91baa8a825cc2f79780
increase penalties for IP violations that endanger public health and
safety
How does something that exists purely in intellect endanger public health
and safety?
--
James McPhee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
Am 07. Mai, 2008 schwätzte James Mcphee so:
increase penalties for IP violations that endanger public health and
safety
How does something that exists purely in intellect endanger public health
and safety?
When they allow corporations to patent genes and then infect 3rd party
crops with
After a long battle with technology, James Mcphee wrote:
increase penalties for IP violations that endanger public health and
safety
How does something that exists purely in intellect endanger public health
and safety?
You know how in H.P. Lovecraft's stories, people read the _Necronomicon_
I was amused where they don't have to get the technical details right. I
can imagine the case.
They violated our IP because they did what we've been trying to do, but
were too stupid to get to work.
--
James McPhee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On May 7, 2008, at 12:34 PM, der.hans wrote:
Apparently organic farmers in the US are protected in that the organic
label won't be taken away if there was accidental contamination. Guess
the FDA is only concerned about minimal efforts to keep our food
safe and
actually having it actually
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 16:51 -0700, Mike Garfias wrote:
On May 7, 2008, at 12:34 PM, der.hans wrote:
Apparently organic farmers in the US are protected in that the organic
label won't be taken away if there was accidental contamination. Guess
the FDA is only concerned about minimal
On May 7, 2008, at 5:18 PM, Craig White wrote:
and it looks like we got a choice between 2 candidates who want to
double down on the ethanol solution.
As a car guy, I _LOVE_ ethanol. 106 octane means being able to run
13:1 compression on the street. However, the idea of making it
14 matches
Mail list logo
