I can not get this to work either, I get the following
[Error] Script lines: 1-1 --
DB2 SQL error: SQLCODE: -811, SQLSTATE: 21000, SQLERRMC: null
Message: The result of a scalar fullselect, SELECT INTO statement, or
VALUES INTO statement is more than one row.
You can't update a row with more than one value. Your select where clause must
be specific enough to ensure only one result (it looks like that may not be the
case, based on the error you're getting). If you have a many-many relationship
between the two tables, the only way to get correct
I would like to talk to somebody off line in regards to setting up a
web server through Cox.
I need help with a basic install and with the lingo that I am reading
about.
Thanks
Carlton Brooks
Mesa, AZ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
PLUG-discuss mailing
Carlton Brooks wrote:
I would like to talk to somebody off line in regards to setting up a
web server through Cox.
I need help with a basic install and with the lingo that I am reading
about.
Thanks
Carlton Brooks
Mesa, AZ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I finally figured out the problem I was having with my laptop not
wanting to boot off the hard drive. Since I've seen this so much
online but rarely answers, I thought I would post this as a sort of
mini-howto on linuxquestions.com (and maybe others), but I wanted to
run it by you guys first.
Bryan O'Neal wrote:
I have not done SQL by hand since sometime in 2005/2006 and I can not
remember how to do a dynamic update using more then one table.
Let us say I have a table A and a table B and I want to update a record
in table A for every record in table b base on information in table
I think Fry's can accommodate you with external HDD housings that would
explicitly meet your needs. One model is designed to stack so you can
easily put as many of them on the table as you like.
On the flip side the cost for the housings, or another type of case
would probably make it a poor
moin moin,
catching up on news of m$ claiming it will support ODF sometime next year.
I notice that m$ is planning on joining standards committees for ODF and
PDF.
Is PDF a standard? I thought PDF was owned and run by Adobe, but they were
allowing 3rd party implementation.
On May 24, 2008, at 2:36 PM, der.hans wrote:
Is PDF a standard? I thought PDF was owned and run by Adobe, but
they were
allowing 3rd party implementation.
Wikipedia says it's a standard:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Document_Format
--
And those who were seen dancing were thought
After a long battle with technology, Dan Lund wrote:
Jon M. Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carlton Brooks wrote:
I would like to talk to somebody off line in regards to setting up a
web server through Cox.
Unless you are on a business account, running a web server is prohibited
and they
Port 443 is open, ala https.
I use it :)
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Jon M. Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carlton Brooks wrote:
I would like to talk to somebody off line in regards to setting up a web
server through Cox.
I need help with a basic install and with the lingo that I am
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Matt Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After a long battle with technology, Dan Lund wrote:
Jon M. Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carlton Brooks wrote:
I would like to talk to somebody off line in regards to setting up a
web server through Cox.
Unless you are
No more than windows is a 'standard' I believe. It IS
wide spread, but with the exception of the windoze
reader, adobe charges, but the ability to implement
apparently is NOT infringement or all the major
distro's would be being sued by Adobe. So IF that is
what makes it a standard, then so be it.
PDF is an ad hoc standard right now. It is on the path to being an
official standard (ISO 32000) but it's not there yet. Honestly, saying
it's not a standard because it doesn't have an ISO code attached to it
is nit-picking to an extreme.
Adobe has always released the specifications of PDF
14 matches
Mail list logo
