Am 05. Mai, 2009 schwätzte jordi laforge so:
moin moin,
Can anyone sugest a decent app to undelete files on a Windows partition?
Hopefully one that is included on a livecd.
Dennis usually rescues system rescue CD.
I think there's a Live CD specifically for hitting windows stuff.
A package s
Can anyone sugest a decent app to undelete files on a Windows partition?
Hopefully one that is included on a livecd.
Thanks
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail setting
I think its pretty clear at this point that paper usage is a problem,
so Im not really going to argue that point.
your anecdote about e-waste is not really a fair point either,
because 1 PC can process millions of documents that would be printed
otherwise- so its not really a valid comparison.
(Since we are top-posting)
In your opinion! I am more then happy to pay my $10 for 1/500th of a
tree planted and harvested and processed by private companies on their
own private property, or resources that would have been cut down and
gone unused otherwise. We don't cut down rainforests for paper
btw- if anyone is interested in these topics, feel free to contact
me off list. Theres much more background to these ideas as well as
plans for implementing.
-jmz
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, keith smith wrote:
>
>
> Man you guys should blog all this... do a few trackbacks... pings and p
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 21:45 -0700, keith smith wrote:
>
>
> Man you guys should blog all this... do a few trackbacks... pings and
> put some adsense on your sites and take a vacation.
>
> Sorry could not help myself.
>
fair enough
I wish you would fix the quoting mechanism of you mail cli
Man you guys should blog all this... do a few trackbacks... pings and put some
adsense on your sites and take a vacation.
Sorry could not help myself.
Keith Smith
--- On Mon, 5/4/09, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
From: Joshua Zeidner
Subject: Re: Linux in a Nutshell (O'Re
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 21:12 -0700, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
>> Craig,
>>
>> you're not really disagreeing with me.
>
> au contrare
>
> I disagree with your dismissive attitude, with your lack of interest in
> the connection of the subject at
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 21:12 -0700, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
> Craig,
>
> you're not really disagreeing with me.
au contrare
I disagree with your dismissive attitude, with your lack of interest in
the connection of the subject at hand to the progenitor of this thread,
with your assertion that
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Bill Lindley wrote:
> Joshua Zeidner wrote:
>> It[']s obvious to anyone who is serious about development
>> that a few google queries rivals what you can find in any printed
>> technical manual
> Except that until you know what you're trying to ask, you can't ask
>
Craig,
you're not really disagreeing with me. I stated several times that
the reason books linger is that there are no dependable ways to
deliver content and compensate authors. Lack of compensation = lack
of quality. So I think an important issue is: can we design a system
where compensatio
Joshua Zeidner wrote:
> It[']s obvious to anyone who is serious about development
> that a few google queries rivals what you can find in any printed
> technical manual
Except that until you know what you're trying to ask, you can't ask
Google for it.
Books and printed man-pages are far more reada
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 19:53 -0700, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Alan Dayley wrote:
> > I don't understand the negativity around dead tree media.
>
> The criticisms are complex. Primarily, chopping down rain forests
> to explain to someone how to write Perl is conside
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Alex Dean wrote:
>
> On May 4, 2009, at 7:23 PM, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Craig White
>> wrote:
>> fact is, those books barely equip you to pass a job interview let
>> alone actually build software. At this point, they act primar
On May 4, 2009, at 7:23 PM, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Craig White
wrote:
fact is, those books barely equip you to pass a job interview let
alone actually build software. At this point, they act primarily as
totems of technical knowledge and tend to help convinc
I agree and disagree. I have a number of O'reilly books in my shelves.
Though I rarely look at one anymore and haven't bought any new editions, I
certainly had found them useful in the past. I suspect there are people who
find them useful today especially where there may be newer editions. I
per
I don't doubt that there is some value there, but we tend to deflate
the collateral costs in terms of environment, and we also tend to
overvalue the credibility associated with publication. These problems
are fairly consistent across most disciplines.
-jmz
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:47 PM, keith
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Alan Dayley wrote:
> I don't understand the negativity around dead tree media.
The criticisms are complex. Primarily, chopping down rain forests
to explain to someone how to write Perl is considered wasteful and
excessive[1]. Its obvious to anyone who is seriou
Could it be you feel this way because you already poses many skills. These
book may have value to someone new to the subject. Is that possible?
Keith Smith
--- On Mon, 5/4/09, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
From: Joshua Zeidner
Subject: Re: Linux in a Nutshell (O'Reilly bo
Thanks Lisa, I totally missed connecting the honeynet reference and the url
you had. I just knew I had seen the other reference. DOH! Sorry
--
Dazed_75 a.k.a. Larry
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe
I don't understand the negativity around dead tree media. It has many
advantages, including ultimate portability and no dead batteries. I
currently have multiple O'Reilly books above my computer here, all of
which I have actually used, some more than others. My Linux Pocket
Guide is an excellent
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Craig White wrote:
> I'm not sure why I am bothering with this but I do happen to own many
> dead tree edition computer books including many O'Reilly books but truth
> be told, they are decorating my office by residing on shelves instead of
> my desk so I think your
I'm not sure why I am bothering with this but I do happen to own many
dead tree edition computer books including many O'Reilly books but truth
be told, they are decorating my office by residing on shelves instead of
my desk so I think your characterization is slightly too narrow.
It's also hard to
agreed. O'reilly = lame. The price of those books is hardly worth
the information in them. They're mainly used for decorating the desks
of poser developers.
-jmz
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Lisa Kachold wrote:
> Snore!
>
> Bored with the under publishing of technical books, and over b
Snore!
Bored with the under publishing of technical books, and over blown accolades
for the few available
O'Really now!
I own that book BTW (and the Unix in A Nutshell it was patterned afer was
well used too) but I find the actual sources of each distribution more
useful (man, cat /proc/cpuin
Depending on how you construe Server, I think that most people would be in
violation of this, considering the vast amount of software that runs a
process continually that listens on specific ports and responds to
requests..
Sincerely,
Judd
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Lisa Kachold wrote:
> I
http://isc.sans.org/port.html?port=7859
-- Forwarded message --
From: Lisa Kachold
Date: Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:56 PM
Subject: Unauthorized Rogue Access Aggressive Distributed Scanning
To: internet.ab...@sjrb.ca, ab...@netatonce.se, r...@eircom.net
Distributed coordinated denial o
why not just use blogger.com?
-jmz
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:29 AM, James Finstrom
wrote:
> So I have cox at home so I obviously would violate the AUP self hosting and
> frankly I am cheap... wait no frugal. Anyway I would like to find a place to
> host my domain free but without ads or if it
I believe we all have our interpretation of laws and rules in America;
unless there are consequences?
Actually, you agree with the Acceptable Use Policy that you will not run a
"server". It also addresses business use in a vague way (doesn't everyone
use their home office for "business")?
*Comme
Mobi Festival is where platform allegiance is checked at the door. The
goal is to bring together mobile enthusiasts, explorers, developers
and professionals to share the current state and their visions for the
future direction of mobility.
Mobi Festival hopes to support the many voices helping to
I like scratchhosting.com. $4 a month, php,mysql, ect., the only
downside is no ssh but otherwise its a good deal, and the people are
great to deal with.
https://scratchhosting.com/hosting.php
They also do game hosting and shoutcast.
Sean
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Lisa Kachold wrote:
>
I have to ask this question
Considering that you can get good web hosting for $6/month from reputable
companies like hostgator and quite a few others (you spend more than that on
coffee!) why would anyone risk losing something they've put their valuable
time into creating a website with a free
Cox blocks incoming port 80 so people trying to get to your website
would have to specify an alternate port. I think there are also port
redirectors with some of the free dynamic DNS services that can do
this for you. You would be risking your service doing this since the
AUP probably says
My interpretation of the AUP, is that they don't want you running then "Next
Slashdot" or "Face Book", with lots of traffic.
If you are only going to use it for personal access, and maybe to show
family photos to friends, then I don't think it would be a problem.
Are we talking Hundreds, Thousa
I wonder what this will mean for multi-national companies? I'm guessing
companies like Cisco will move off shore completely.
---
"Cisco would be adversely affected if tax deferral was implemented by
the U.S.," said Cisco spokesman John Earnhardt. "If rules are changed
on tax deferral and we are
Thanks for all of the links and info. If I run into this again I will
know what to do.
Until then I did find a Firefox extension called UnMHT that did a pretty
damn good job at rendering the original file from the MCC website.
-Original Message-
>From: Joseph Sinclair
>Sent: May 4, 2009
Default save-as for many Outlook (full) installations is MHT, which is an
MS-specific MIME archive format, sort of.
Usually, you can run the extracted source through a mime decoder to get a
message-plus-attachments output, and then pull the HTML doc from there.
Once you have "clean" MSHTML (it's
From: Lisa Kachold
> http://www.toastedspam.com/decodeqp
> It should be noted that quoted-printable encoded text is generally
> associated with EMAIL, not Word?
The composer of the message probably wrote the message in Word, then
pasted it into a mail client. Word->HTML->quoted-printable-encode
Well somehow some brain-dead web designer at MCC has managed to put
a Mime encoded syllabus online for their students. The actual file
I downloaded had a *.mht file extension and contained in that was
various bits of Mime encoded crap. One section was even base64
stuff. The bit I was able to extrac
Tim O'Reilly just tweeted this...
Linux Journal Reader's Choice Awards: Linux in a Nutshell favorite Linux
book of all time. I'm honored. http://bit.ly/hhTBH
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscr
I like 110mb.com - free; not fast, some technical issues, but still FREE!
Unless you want mysql and server mail, then it's like $16.00 a year.
They host this great site:
http://freetube.110mb.com
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Joe wrote:
> If you don't need a ton of space, you might be able
You can try this Toaster SPAM decoder (it will readily tell you if
it's decodable
as Decode quoted-printable encoded text):
http://www.toastedspam.com/decodeqp
It should be noted that quoted-printable encoded text is generally
associated with EMAIL, not Word?
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Mat
From: "Steven A. DuChene"
> It is filled with a lot of un-needed style and formating tags
> as well as all kinds of stupid extra characters due to some MS
> "standard" character formatting stuff. Things like braking lines
> in the middle of words and then adding an equal sign at the end
> of the b
Load into OpenOffice, display source, remove formatting, highlight,
cut/splice into text file, or save as text, rename to HTML?
Should work?
There are also online document conversions, I think MS HTML to text is one
of them?
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Steven A. DuChene <
linux-clust...@min
We will be relocating the HackFest at the Foundation for Blind Children
(Map below) in June.
This will provide a regular room,with regular network, and systems we can
setup as a test lab for whatever purpose we are evaluating. Hopefully we
can do some exciting work, demonstrate and test vulnerab
Joe Stewart is currently "Director of Malware Research" at SecureWorks (a
private securityconsultancy) [read reverse engineering, highly trained lab
dog & sec-con hobo]. Joe has participated in development for:
http://www.joestewart.org/?page_id=5
and submitted extensive virus content contributio
But I don't own Dreamweaver and I see from checking the Adobe
site for Dreamweaver it only runs on MS WinBlows and MaOSuX.
I am really looking for a solution that will work on Linux! :-)
There must be some set of scripts somewhere that will do this.
I cannot POSSIBLY be the first person who has r
You can do a lot of it in word itself by saving as filtered html.
I've used open office to generate better html in the past.
NVU/komposer does a decent job cleaning up bad html.
--
JD Austin
Twin Geckos Technology Services LLC
j...@twingeckos.com
480.288.8195x201
http://www.twingeckos.com
George
Maybe?
http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/
http://tidy.sourceforge.net/
Enrique
Steven A. DuChene writes:
> Hello all:
> My wife has a class sylibus file from one of her profs at MCC and the file
> is "supposed" to be html but it is that awful sort-of-html crap from
> MS-Office. It is fil
I know dremweaver had a fucntion to "clean up Word HTML"
not sure about a free one... id have to google this one myself.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Steven A. DuChene
wrote:
> Hello all:
> My wife has a class sylibus file from one of her profs at MCC and the file
> is "supposed" to be html
Hello all:
My wife has a class sylibus file from one of her profs at MCC and the file
is "supposed" to be html but it is that awful sort-of-html crap from
MS-Office. It is filled with a lot of un-needed style and formating tags
as well as all kinds of stupid extra characters due to some MS "standar
If you don't need a ton of space, you might be able to get away with a
free UNIX shell.
http://www.red-pill.eu/freeunix.shtml
Otherwise, Dreamhost is dirt cheap.
http://www.dreamhost.com/hosting.html
$119.40/year ($9.95/mo) for unlimited webpage space, bandwidth, email
accounts, ftp access, dom
If you put a link to my hosting site on your page, I'll give you a low
bandwidth account for free. Contact me offline.
Thanks,
Eric
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Alan Dayley wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:29 AM, James Finstrom
> wrote:
> > So I have cox at home so I obviously would violate
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:29 AM, James Finstrom
wrote:
> So I have cox at home so I obviously would violate the AUP self hosting and
> frankly I am cheap... wait no frugal. Anyway I would like to find a place to
> host my domain free but without ads or if it has ads it allows choice of
> placement
If you want hosting w/o ads and reliable you will have to pay $4/mo. If you
want to host multiple domains in one hosting account look at HostGator. I
think they charge $7/mo. Want reseller hosting look at HostGator. I host
about 60 domains for $25/mo in a reseller account. That is less th
no idea. the last one i found i liked went away and sold my email
address to the company that took them over...
which was a paid only company...
but do note, you can get single domain hosting for pretty stupid cheap now...
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:29 AM, James Finstrom
wrote:
> So I have cox at
So I have cox at home so I obviously would violate the AUP self hosting and
frankly I am cheap... wait no frugal. Anyway I would like to find a place to
host my domain free but without ads or if it has ads it allows choice of
placement in the design.
I use the page for:
Public display of personal
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Lisa Kachold wrote:
> The Honeynet project (sponsoring 9 projects in Google's Summer of Code this
> year) has a really great LiveCD called Roo, that creates an immediate trap
> of magnificent proportions:
>
> https://projects.honeynet.org/honeywall/attachment/wiki/W
This is interesting, in ubuntu 8.04/8.10 and 9.04 the fglrx driver
works fine, only issues i am running into is 3d windows games under
wine. all the Linux native stuff runs like a champ.
I know in 8.04 and 8.10 i had to run the driver from ATI's site
instead of a repo built driver, but in 9.04 th
59 matches
Mail list logo
