On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 17:36 -0700, JD Austin wrote:
> Josef Lowder wrote:
> > Ok ... call me lazy. Whatever you say, JT. ;)
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, JT Moree wrote
> >
> > > Josef Lowder wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, as a general guidel
Josef Lowder wrote:
Ok ... call me lazy. Whatever you say, JT. ;)
---
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, JT Moree wrote
Josef Lowder wrote:
Well, as a general guideline, perhaps;
but as has been discussed here before,
sometimes a quick and simple top post
does h
you should write a utility to do that automatically! I would
suggest using the BSD license in order not to disclude future profits.
;)
-jmz
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Josef Lowder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Ok ... call me lazy. Whatever you say, JT. ;)
>
>
>
> -
Ok ... call me lazy. Whatever you say, JT. ;)
---
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, JT Moree wrote
> Josef Lowder wrote:
> > Well, as a general guideline, perhaps;
> > but as has been discussed here before,
> > sometimes a quick and simple top post
> > does have some be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josef Lowder wrote:
> Well, as a general guideline, perhaps; but as has been discussed
> here before, sometimes a quick and simple top post does have some
> benefits.
rarely. It's usually because people are too lazy to clean up the excess
and unne
.
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:52, Dennis Kibbe wrote
> ... it's a list for Linux users of all levels from Linux
> graybeards to Ubuntu newbies. One thing that PLUG can't
> afford is to alienate its new users.
Amen Dennis. And nothing alienates new and old users more
than flames and ego-centric faul
>On 27 Mar 2008 21:50:58 -0700, Dennis Kibbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mail clients, like Evolution & T'bird are not designed to handle mail
>lists where you receive a large volume of mail that can clog your inbox
>and which is often off topic.
> Dennis, Herein lies the problem- the sematics
Kevin,
Sorry if you misread that as an attempt to insult Dennis.
Im certainly not invalidating his contribution here, but it should
be noted that I find the understandings of things like 'spam' and 'off
topic' are a bit crude amongst the participants on this list. 'Spam',
'Off topic' and mos
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 12:43 -0700, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
> On 27 Mar 2008 21:50:58 -0700, Dennis Kibbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mail clients, like Evolution & T'bird are not designed to handle mail lists
> > where you receive a large volume of mail that can clog your inbox and which
> > is
Calm down guy. All he did was point out a problem that exists on mailing lists.
He didn't point fingers or anything, you interpreted it differently.
Here this is more constructive.
Thank you Dennis for pointing this out to me.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:43:27PM -0700, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
> On
On 27 Mar 2008 21:50:58 -0700, Dennis Kibbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mail clients, like Evolution & T'bird are not designed to handle mail lists
> where you receive a large volume of mail that can clog your inbox and which
> is often off topic.
Dennis, Herein lies the problem- the sematic
Mail clients, like Evolution & T'bird are not designed to handle mail lists
where you receive a large volume of mail that can clog your inbox and which is
often off topic.
One way to get around this problem is to read the list with a newsreader like
pan or gnus (Emacs). You can do this at www.g
12 matches
Mail list logo