On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 16:52 -0700, Stephen P Rufle wrote:
http://digg.com/linux_unix/Open_DS_Governance_Issues
---
I presume that this was tossed to the list for commentary but it's
possible that the intent was to smear Sun for heavy handedness (although
that is not entirely unexpected). It would
and a very impressive, almost AD like...
AD is impressive?
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
Yeah I just wanted to see what people thought about the issues that came
up. I saw commentary about just forking the OpenDS proj , but was unsure
if that was even possible. I am currently a Java developer and hope that
this was an isolated incident that will put pressure on Sun to better
Sun's gonna learn from this? Don't bet the farm.
As for forking, my take on the CDDL is that it's possible but that it
must also carry the CDDL license with it covering the original software.
Craig
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 19:52 -0700, Stephen P Rufle wrote:
Yeah I just wanted to see what people
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 19:50 -0700, Ben Francom wrote:
and a very impressive, almost AD like...
AD is impressive?
yeah but more on that in a second...
I was referring to their new 'Directory Express' and 'Directory Server
Gateway' web tools screenshots as they've had their
http://digg.com/linux_unix/Open_DS_Governance_Issues
--
Stephen P Rufle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
H1:480-626-8022
H2:480-802-7173
Yahoo IM: stephen_rufle
AOL IM: stephen1rufle
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To
