READ!
Never mind whether I agree with James Finstrom or not... (I might, but that
is outside the scope of this [OT] message);
more importantly, ... double check that ad!;
its FIRST bullet point, is:
*Develop Cheaper and Faster** – *Use additional Microsoft software licenses
internally for your
I got this message (on LinkedIn.com):
http://partner.linkedin.com/2010/01/linkedin-partner-message-from-microsoft-12/?n=4d696b65
http://partner.linkedin.com/2010/01/linkedin-partner-message-from-microsoft-12/?n=4d696b65It
has also been archived here:
http://www.webcitation.org/5muPL2hYq
so that
I'm confused.
Re-read the message but substitute Red Had Certified Engineer or
Red Hat Partner everywhere it says Microsoft? Is it still a bad
message? If not, why not?
Alan
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Mike Schwartz schwa...@acm.org wrote:
I got this message (on LinkedIn.com):
Yeah it is... Redhat ewww
On 1/19/10, Alan Dayley ala...@consultpros.com wrote:
I'm confused.
Re-read the message but substitute Red Had Certified Engineer or
Red Hat Partner everywhere it says Microsoft? Is it still a bad
message? If not, why not?
Alan
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:21 PM,
