PXE vs PXE

2010-02-12 Thread Dazed_75
Turns out the two PXE servers I built do totally different things and really should be called PXE based Install Servers AND I can imagine a third which might more properly be described as a PXE Boot Server. BTW, for those who do not know, PXE stands for Pre-eXecution Environment and really does

Re: PXE vs PXE

2010-02-12 Thread Lisa Kachold
This has been a standard technique in Unix [BSD, AIX, Solaris and HP-UX] for diskless servers since the early days (pre-Linus). In linux PXE booting from servers is best supported via LTSP project: http://www.ltsp.org/ http://www.kegel.com/linux/pxe.html

Re: PXE vs PXE

2010-02-12 Thread Paul Mooring
Another setup I think works pretty well is thinstation http://www.thinstation.org/ It's used to boot into a really minimal version of linux that connects directly to a remote server through rdp, vnc. ssh, ect On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Lisa Kachold lisakach...@obnosis.com wrote: This has

Re: PXE vs PXE

2010-02-12 Thread Stephen
This might be interestingly relevant as well: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/ltsp/index.php?title=Ltsp_BootingFromLocalDevice its a branch from LTSP however for old machines that don't have PXE functions. On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Paul Mooring drpppr...@gmail.com wrote: Another

Re: PXE vs PXE

2010-02-12 Thread Dazed_75
Great references. Thanks Lisa! I may not live long enough to read all that they refer to though. :) I should have realized that my number 3 was basically the thin client idea. I just never looked into that side to see it was (or coould be) based on PXE. I still wonder about building a PXE

Re: PXE vs PXE

2010-02-12 Thread Eric Shubert
Dazed_75 wrote: What I would like to see for method #1 is that the .iso files were retained for use in burning discs either on the PXE server or a client on the net (not a PXE function) AND might be mounted by the PXE server function rather than having to extract files when building the

Re: PXE vs PXE

2010-02-12 Thread Dazed_75
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: Dazed_75 wrote: What I would like to see for method #1 is that the .iso files were retained for use in burning discs either on the PXE server or a client on the net (not a PXE function) AND might be mounted by the PXE

Re: PXE vs PXE

2010-02-12 Thread Matt Graham
From: Dazed_75 lthiels...@gmail.com [loopback mounting of ISOs] And since there could be many such .iso's to mount are there any limits on the number of mounts, or mounted files, or One might need to mount on demand to reduce some resource usage. There is so much to learn I could almost