Hi Sean,
How are you Kurt?
Eric, good post!
Oh goodie! Distro WARZ! :)
The project update should include realistic human timeline (hands
available per day, etc) and state available resources for each phase,
with parts and materials, and include dependencies, such as vnc or ssh
access
Since, so many wanted my project to be posted for the benefit of all, I'll
start be defining what our first steps are going to be. I had an opportunity
to sit down and discuss my goals and get some advice, so this is how we have
decided to proceed:
Goal: Build as much
nix.az.us>
Subject: Project Update
<zzz!--[if gte="" mso="" 9]="">
<zzz![endif]--><zzz!--[if gte="" mso="" 9]="">
<zzz![endif]-->
Since, so many wanted my project to be posted for the
benefit
, 2010 12:11 PM
To: 'Main PLUG discussion list'
Subject: Project Update
Since, so many wanted my project to be posted for the benefit of all,
I’ll start be defining what our first steps are going to be. I had an
opportunity to sit down and discuss my goals and get some advice, so this is
how
The big difference between Fedora and Centos other than Centos lagging
behind Fedora is that Centos is a server distribution and the repository
will be around for 10 years.
I've been burned a couple of times when I inherited unmaintained systems
built on desktop distributions (in my case Ubuntu)
Steven A. DuChene wrote:
If it was me I would look for a distribution that had newer bits (Samba
etc)
than CentOS5.4
Perhaps OpenSuSE-11.2 or similar.
Newer etc? ;)
I am a little disappointed that CentOS5 doesn't have a more recent
Samba, but newer Samba rpms for EL5 are available from
Sean Parsons wrote:
Since, so many wanted my project to be posted for the benefit of all,
I’ll start be defining what our first steps are going to be. I had an
opportunity to sit down and discuss my goals and get some advice, so
this is how we have decided to proceed:
Good point JD. I always try to steer people away from Fedora for servers
in general, especially production servers.
Fedora as a desktop is entirely different, although personally I
appreciate more stability there as well. My desktop at the moment is
Ubuntu 8.04 LTS. A new LTS desktop version
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 18:30 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
Steven A. DuChene wrote:
If it was me I would look for a distribution that had newer bits (Samba
etc)
than CentOS5.4
Perhaps OpenSuSE-11.2 or similar.
Newer etc? ;)
I am a little disappointed that CentOS5 doesn't have a
I know that Fedora and redhat are related and how, not so sure on the SuSE
genealogy. It is my understanding that OpenSuse is the development version
of SuSE in the same way that Fedora is the development version of Redhat.
My point being (as has been discussed in the last few messages) that
I follow your meaning now. I misunderstood what you meant.
(I tend to read things too literally sometimes)
Steve Phariss wrote:
I know that Fedora and redhat are related and how, not so sure on the
SuSE genealogy. It is my understanding that OpenSuse is the
development version of SuSE in
-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of Steve
Phariss
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 10:22 PM
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: Project Update
I know that Fedora and redhat are related and how, not so sure on the SuSE
A few details:
Fedora = Community based bleeding-edge distro
begets
RedHat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) = Proprietary long-term distro
shadowed by
CentOS = Community version of RHEL long-term distro
OpenSUSE = Community based bleeding-edge distro
begets
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) =
13 matches
Mail list logo
