On 5/18/09 11:14 AM, "keith smith" wrote:
> I'm running a CentOS LAMP server and it appears that access logging has
> discontinued.
>
> I'm thinking there is a messages log file some place that might shed light on
> what or how the access logging was turned off.
>
> I've looked under /var/log a
--- On Mon, 5/18/09, Charles Jones wrote:
> From: Charles Jones
> Subject: Re: HTTP Access Logging
> To: "Main PLUG discussion list"
> Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 11:17 AM
>
> On 5/18/09 11:14 AM, "keith smith"
> wrote:
> > I'm runni
Sorry for the confusion. I was thinking it was June not may. Everything is
there. Silly me!
Keith Smith
--- On Mon, 5/18/09, keith smith wrote:
> From: keith smith
> Subject: Re: HTTP Access Logging
> To: "Main PLUG discussion list"
>
list
Subject: Re: HTTP Access Logging
Sorry for the confusion. I was thinking it was June not may. Everything is
there. Silly me!
Keith Smith
--- On Mon, 5/18/09, keith smith wrote:
> From: keith smith
> Subject: Re: HTTP Access Logging
> To: "M
gt; From: Bob Elzer
> Subject: RE: HTTP Access Logging
> To: "'Main PLUG discussion list'"
> Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 11:54 AM
> What planet are you from. Are
> you sure you're on the right one. LOL
>
>
> -Original Message--
Hi!
Logging is decreed by the httpd configuration files, and can either be
included in a directory full of configuration files, configured in
httpd.conf which can be either in /etc/httpd/conf.d (/etc/httpd/conf) or
another location (which can be set during build of binary or by distro.
So from ht
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:23 -0700, keith smith wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion. I was thinking it was June not may. Everything is
> there. Silly me!
it feels like June outside
Craig
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to b
Thanks for your kindness!
Keith Smith
--- On Mon, 5/18/09, Craig White wrote:
> From: Craig White
> Subject: Re: HTTP Access Logging
> To: "Main PLUG discussion list"
> Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 12:50 PM
> On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:23 -
smith wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for your kindness!
>
>
> Keith Smith
>
>
> --- On Mon, 5/18/09, Craig White wrote:
>
> > From: Craig White
> > Subject: Re: HTTP Access Logging
> > To: "Main PLUG discussion list"
> >
list
Subject: Re: HTTP Access Logging and apology to Hans
that sounds mean, BOB. If you were trying to sound funny it didn't work.
further:
Hans, I re-read my comment concerning the picture and asking if that was you
and realized it might be misconstrued as an insult. I did not mean it that
hoenix.az.us [mailto:
> plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] *On Behalf Of *mike havens
> *Sent:* Monday, May 18, 2009 4:11 PM
> *To:* Main PLUG discussion list
> *Subject:* Re: HTTP Access Logging and apology to Hans
>
> that sounds mean, BOB. If you were trying to soun
: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 3:40 AM
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: HTTP Access Logging and apology to Hans
I didn't see the "LOL". Sorry.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Bob Elzer wrote:
I was trying to be funny, hence the LOL
If it wasn't taken
ay I apologize.
>
>
> --
> *From:* plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us [mailto:
> plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] *On Behalf Of *mike havens
> *Sent:* Monday, May 18, 2009 4:11 PM
> *To:* Main PLUG discussion list
> *Subject:* Re: HTTP Access Logging and apo
13 matches
Mail list logo
