If spam is the problem, a better mail server can be the solution.
Running your own mail server isn't nearly as complicated as it used to be.
QmailToaster (http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com) with spamdyke is a very good
combination. Spamdyke rejects 90+% of spam without even receiving (or
scanning)
Rusty, how did tarpit and that delay time effect non spam users?
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Carruth, Rusty
rusty.carr...@smartstoragesys.com wrote:
Some time back I thought the best solution would be to form a co-op. Members
of the co-op would run some sort of program to detect spammers,
As I remember (but remember whose memory we are talking about :-) -
I had 3 lists - those known to be spammers, those known to be ok, and
anybody else. (Ok, so the 'anybody else' wasn't actually a LIST, it was
anybody not in the first 2 lists)
Known spammers got some huge delay (I think I
I don't remember the url, but a few years ago I found a site that had an
interesting idea to fight those who try to con people into handing over
account information. If you got one of these scam emaills, you would
submit the url the phishers included. Their system would generate
random
