Making it through what?
;-)
Alan
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Wayne Davis wayda...@centurylink.netwrote:
is this making it through?
--**-
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
Beware the scrum mentality!
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Alan Dayley aday...@gmail.com wrote:
Making it through what?
;-)
Alan
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Wayne Davis wayda...@centurylink.netwrote:
is this making it through?
--**-
Yes
On Oct 8, 2012 7:22 PM, Wayne Davis wayda...@centurylink.net wrote:
is this making it through?
--**-
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
plug-disc...@lists.plug.**phoenix.az.usPLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to
Only for the next 60 seconds as this is only a test.
On 10/08/2012 07:24 PM, Alan Dayley wrote:
Making it through what?
;-)
Alan
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Wayne Davis wayda...@centurylink.net
mailto:wayda...@centurylink.net wrote:
is this making it through?
I also use Jenkins + phing to run my tests.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Eric Cope eric.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I second using Jenkins to run your tests.
Eric
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Alex Dean a...@crackpot.org wrote:
If I remember correctly Cucumber will make HTTP requests to
I use the light weight unit test library coupled with PHPUnit's code coverage
tool. If you google PHPUnit and CodeIgniter, someone already has integrated
them. I've tried to use Selenium's web driver, but PHP is not an officially
supported language. I never could get them to play nicely.
Let
If I remember correctly Cucumber will make HTTP requests to your test server.
So there's no reason you couldn't write your tests in Ruby even if the server
code is PHP. You can use CI server like Jenkins to run your PHPUnit tests.
On Mar 12, 2012, at 7:12 PM, Eric Cope wrote:
I use the
I second using Jenkins to run your tests.
Eric
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Alex Dean a...@crackpot.org wrote:
If I remember correctly Cucumber will make HTTP requests to your test server.
So there's no reason you couldn't write your tests in Ruby even if the server
code is PHP. You
Thank you all. Apparently I was not clear that I was talking about doing
this for a number of files and in potentially several directories in a
hierarchy. Since sed seems also to have no recursive directory option
either, it seems I have to just know which direcories have eligable files in
them
Am 14. Sep, 2011 schwätzte Dazed_75 so:
moin moin,
Thank you all. Apparently I was not clear that I was talking about doing
this for a number of files and in potentially several directories in a
hierarchy. Since sed seems also to have no recursive directory option
either, it seems I have to
Can you copy the file to /tmp and run it there?
Eric Cope
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Dazed_75 lthiels...@gmail.com wrote:
How do people test sed replacements on something consequential? I thought
I remembered sed having an option to just report what changes it WOULD HAVE
made without
The default for sed is to output the results to stdout.
If you just leave out the option to write back to the original file, wouldn't
that work as a test?
Alternatively you could pipe the sed output into diff against the original file
Something like this:
sed -e 'command' infile | diff infile -
-i.bak (no space) to keep a backup of the original in case you need to
revert the changes.
Kevin
On Sep 13, 2011 10:00 PM, Dazed_75 lthiels...@gmail.com wrote:
How do people test sed replacements on something consequential? I thought
I
remembered sed having an option to just report what changes
On Sat 25 July 2009 1:52:44 pm Jim wrote:
test
Sorry, your message didn't make it to the mailing list.
---
Ryan Rix
(623)-826-0051
Q: Why shouldn't I simply delete the stuff I never use, it's just taking up
space?
A: This question is in the category of Famous Last Words..
-- From
Had this been an actual message, you would have been instructed where to
tune in.
-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On
Behalf Of Jim
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 1:53 PM
To: PLUG
I got it at 06/04 @ 9:39am -- I guess my computer is faster than yours. ;)
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Josef Lowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wednesday, June 4, 2008 at 9:40 am
Just testing to see if this message gets delivered to plug.
---
I got it at 06/04 @ 9:39am -- I guess my computer is faster than yours. ;)
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Josef Lowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wednesday, June 4, 2008 at 9:40 am
Just testing to see if this message gets delivered to plug.
---
The PLUG is the only group that will test ad infinum and love it.
We will TEST ANYTHING over and over!
Laugh!
Jared Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got it at 06/04 @ 9:39am -- I guess
my computer is faster than yours. ;)
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Josef Lowder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes, though it says it is 6 hours old. I just logged in and it is here
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Josef Lowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wednesday, June 4, 2008 at 9:40 am
Just testing to see if this message gets delivered to plug.
---
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Josef Lowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
An email message I sent to plug from my new gmail account
about 45 minutes ago has not yet shown up so this is a test
from my previous email account to see if there is some problem.
Hi,
To find commands or files, use the following shell tools:
which sendmail
This will tell you if the command is in your bash PATH (check /etc/profile and
$HOME/.bash_profile $HOME/.bashrc or just type set
locate sendmail
Locate is an add on tool you can install from your package
Eh, gmail doesn't show you emails you sent, to you.
It's a trivialty that's gotten me many many times also... no harm no foul.
None the less, it made it through at 10:10am according to the timestamp here.
--Dan
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Josef Lowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
An email
Dan Lund wrote:
Eh, gmail doesn't show you emails you sent, to you.
It's a trivialty that's gotten me many many times also... no harm no foul.
None the less, it made it through at 10:10am according to the timestamp here.
--Dan
I think you are looking at the email Joe sent from his other
Here is a question. What local computer parts store is everyone using.
Fry's has been getting worse and worse over the years. Best buy has a
smaller selection of the same stuff for a bit more money. Where should I go
when when I just have to get that newest thingamajig today.
Steve Phariss
Steve Phariss wrote:
Here is a question. What local computer parts store is everyone
using. Fry's has been getting worse and worse over the years. Best
buy has a smaller selection of the same stuff for a bit more money.
Where should I go when when I just have to get that newest thingamajig
Good call then, thanks for the heads up.
--Dan
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:06 PM, KevinO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Lund wrote:
Eh, gmail doesn't show you emails you sent, to you.
It's a trivialty that's gotten me many many times also... no harm no foul.
None the less, it made it through at
If Joe is using Ubuntu, it doesn't actually ship an MTA by default in
the desktop edition, so nothing will be symlinked as 'sendmail' (does
anyone actually use sendmail proper these days? heh)
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 12:43 -0700, Lisa Kachold wrote:
Hi,
To find commands or files, use the
See http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Mail/mtas.html
Postfix, Exim other MTA's support sendmail command line options.
Francis Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If Joe is using Ubuntu, it doesn't
actually ship an MTA by default in
the desktop edition, so nothing will be symlinked as 'sendmail' (does
anyone
that is a verygood thing to know! thank you.
On 5/19/08, Dan Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gmail has internal filters that will not give
you emails from a mailing list that you sent.
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
Okay... mytest was whether I needed kmail off to get gmail on my laptop.
Huh? THat isn't right! In any case I changed my subscription email to my
gmail account but gmail doesn't seem to be getting plug mail. Any ideas as
to why that is? Before you ask I did make sure I was not set to digest.
On
that isn't quite rightI had to create a new PLUG account. I still get
email on KMAIL I just can't send.
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 5:19 AM, mike havens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay... mytest was whether I needed kmail off to get gmail on my laptop.
Huh? THat isn't right! In any case I
Who is your internet service provider?
mike havens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that isn't quite rightI had to
create a new PLUG account. I still get email on KMAIL I just can't send.
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 5:19 AM, mike havens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay... mytest was whether I
OrangeRoot1000 wrote:
Oh I probably didn't have everything all set up then.
ViViViPirePengy
-
If you can configure your mail client to send your key as PGP/MIME,
it'll be an attachment rather than inline in your message. Easier to
read, if you ask me, since your entire key won't be
Congrats, it went through!
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:33 PM, OrangeRoot1000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a test of pgp signature.
ViViViPirePenguin
--
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
I'm just curious. Why did you use you entire pgp public key in the signature?
You could simply include the key id: 08310392
Also, in this message and the later one regarding Mutt, you did not
sign the message with your key.:)
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:33 PM, OrangeRoot1000 [EMAIL
Oh I probably didn't have everything all set up then.
ViViViPirePengy
-
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
mQGiBEft1DoRBACyCKw+v/JfC4r2qEVt/Cw5ahen5FOTPWMUwwduuX5gZCWsei57
ALxKqdJs86NCdnCl2XyWyEYrCVmHWK48YOkO+Ndw9qsSd7wAjJI+kAc9P/84Bu+9
Robert Holtzman wrote:
test
Robert,
Four email tests in two days is quite a few.
Are the tests working? Do you need some help with something?
Alan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
You won't see it posted... only others will.
The list doesn't echo emails back to the user who sent it.
--Dan
On 9/27/07, Technomage-hawke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to send an e-mail direct from google last night, only I have yet to
see it posted.
can anyone let me know if this makes
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 08:14:14AM -0700, Craig White wrote:
by default, gmail will suppress display of your own messages to mail
lists
it confuses people
The principle of most surprise? The principle of least knowledge? ;-)
--
Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group |
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 08:05 -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:34:44AM -0700, Dan Lund wrote:
You won't see it posted... only others will.
The list doesn't echo emails back to the user who sent it.
I keep seeing that, and I don't know where it comes from. I see my own
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:34:44AM -0700, Dan Lund wrote:
You won't see it posted... only others will.
The list doesn't echo emails back to the user who sent it.
I keep seeing that, and I don't know where it comes from. I see my own
messages, and I always have. I did do anything special with
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 08:10:32AM -0700, Dan Lund wrote:
Odd, it acted the same when I had it on my cox account too.
Oh well, c'est la vie. Suffice to say that it's not worth losing sleep over.
Probably not worth so much as a wink.
I do like knowing that my email has gone through. It would
Please see:
http://lists.plug.phoenix.az.us/lurker/message/20070610.164854.6d59d633.en.html
(As others mentioned, Gmail has it's own behavior that may change a
user's perception of how this all works.)
Alan
Dan Lund wrote:
You won't see it posted... only others will.
The list doesn't echo
To help others out, setting Receive acknowledgment mail when you send
mail to the list? will help those that want acknowledgment that the
list has processed the mail you sent out.
Granted, when someone responds to your email, hopefully the text will
be helpfully quoted below the response.
--Dan
I got it :)
On 9/27/07, Technomage-hawke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to send an e-mail direct from google last night, only I have yet
to
see it posted.
can anyone let me know if this makes it (this should be working)
---
PLUG-discuss
Am 28. Sep, 2007 schw�tzte Dan Lund so:
You won't see it posted... only others will.
The list doesn't echo emails back to the user who sent it.
I think the default is to send emails to the sender. If it's not I think
it should be.
In any case that setting can be changed per user.
ciao,
Am 28. Sep, 2007 schw�tzte Darrin Chandler so:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 08:10:32AM -0700, Dan Lund wrote:
Odd, it acted the same when I had it on my cox account too.
Oh well, c'est la vie. Suffice to say that it's not worth losing sleep over.
Probably not worth so much as a wink.
I do like
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 09:20 -0700, Technomage-hawke wrote:
I tried to send an e-mail direct from google last night, only I have yet to
see it posted.
can anyone let me know if this makes it (this should be working)
nope - doesn't work...keep trying
--
Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
seems to have made it fine. :-)
Technomage-hawke wrote:
I tried to send an e-mail direct from google last night, only I have yet to
see it posted.
can anyone let me know if this makes it (this should be working)
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list
Yes almighty inquisitor.
Book flies at the speaker, ID10T he said ignore him!
Pained geek looks back at the book thrower, My head hurts.
Pained geek falls over loosing a tooth, the book thrower whistles as he
walks away ignoring the galactic inquisitor.
-Rhunelord
On 9/23/07, David Huerta
... what?
On 9/24/07, Rhune Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes almighty inquisitor.
Book flies at the speaker, ID10T he said ignore him!
Pained geek looks back at the book thrower, My head hurts.
Pained geek falls over loosing a tooth, the book thrower whistles as he
walks away ignoring
Hmm... I guess I can post to the list after all. Did anyone catch my
last post about DeLUG looking for a guest speaker for their next
meeting, by chance?
...the galactic inquisitor reference came from the the Venture Brothers :).
On 9/23/07, David Huerta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am the
Yeah, I saw it. It won't punt it back to you by default, just so you know.
On 9/24/07, David Huerta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm... I guess I can post to the list after all. Did anyone catch my
last post about DeLUG looking for a guest speaker for their next
meeting, by chance?
...the
Yup
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:35 -0700, David Huerta wrote:
Hmm... I guess I can post to the list after all. Did anyone catch my
last post about DeLUG looking for a guest speaker for their next
meeting, by chance?
...the galactic inquisitor reference came from the the Venture Brothers :).
Noted; I didn't realize that.
On 9/24/07, David Munson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I saw it. It won't punt it back to you by default, just so you know.
On 9/24/07, David Huerta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm... I guess I can post to the list after all. Did anyone catch my
last post about
I can has none reesp0nce?
IM IN UR LISTZ RPLYIN UR MSG!!!111
--
Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/
http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation
test
On 6/12/07, Dazed_75 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a test of an option for the discuss-list. The test will be
useless af anyone replies to it before Friday 6/15
--
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter
and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seuss
Thank you Shane. Both my original message from yesterday and your reply
showed up today at 5:40 pm demonstrating again that when I send a new
message (not a reply) to the discussion-list, it NEVER shows up for me until
(and unless) someone replies to it.
On 6/13/07, Shane Lofgren [EMAIL
Dazed_75,
Sorry I thought I remembered settings being available that I do not see
now. Ignore my reply.
-Shane
On 6/13/07, Shane Lofgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure if you have stated but have you tried editing your
preferences for your account?
59 matches
Mail list logo
