Off site storage is a given once figure that out
This is quite interesting to say the least
Thanks to all the varied input
On 4/19/09, Bryan O'Neal wrote:
> Have you thought about a private cloud instead? Using something similar to a
> in house EBS solution you could add space on the fly, aggres
Have you thought about a private cloud instead? Using something similar to a
in house EBS solution you could add space on the fly, aggressively cache for
performance, and have it well distributed across your campuses. In addition
I believe Ubuntu 9.4 Server even comes preconfigured with Eucalyptus
Not likely to be doing av edits directly but we will need some fair io
The server backend is likely to be a stack of xenservers. The best
part is we will be building the datacenter from scratch
On 4/19/09, Shawn Badger wrote:
> You could either go with a NetApp or EMC solution and not make a b
You could either go with a NetApp or EMC solution and not make a bad choice
on either, but be warned that you will be spending over $100K to get it up
and running right. Are you going to be editing the video while it directly
stored on the SAN or is the SAN just going to be a repository? If you a
On a slightly different note, I support a large san based off of HP EVA
storage (~60tb) attached to a clustered GS320 running Tru64 Unix and another
system HP GS1280) attached to the same fabric using an additional 24tb. Also
a system running HPUX (two RX8620's) also attached to about 48TB. Th
I didn't quote how many terrabytes per 9U server, as it varied, depending on
3Ware card population (multiple) and disk.
BTW in the SAN/NAS industry Terrabyte capable doesn't simply mean ONE...
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Stephen wrote:
> actually you cna do better than 3tb in a 1u... 8x5
actually you cna do better than 3tb in a 1u... 8x500gb 2.5 in drives
in a SuperMicro 1u or 6tb in raid 5 wiht the new 2tb drives coming.
we will have a real budget for this. and the last thing we want is an
array that has to continually rebuild.
We have an openfiler box, but it does not seem to h
Isn't that awesome 9U 1TB now 1U 3TB..
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Lisa Kachold wrote:
> The bottom line here is going to be cost, sounds like.
>
> You could go out to get EMC/Clarion, or Netappliance, yet if what you
> really might be able to afford is going to come off of Fry's racks.
The bottom line here is going to be cost, sounds like.
You could go out to get EMC/Clarion, or Netappliance, yet if what you really
might be able to afford is going to come off of Fry's racks. Go look at
what they have? Unless you need a NAS like a Sun 2450 with fiber channel
multipath I/O this
We have built an NAS appliance around open filer which is suppose to
do san stuff. I haven't played with it that deep but it may be worth
googling
On 4/17/09, Stephen wrote:
> well i have a large project, I need to create a "growable" store of
> data that is redundant as it will have archival med
well i have a large project, I need to create a "growable" store of
data that is redundant as it will have archival media (audio and
video). both will be HD quality media. so i am looking at a large pool
fo data.
i can build a NAS box that will last a while, but it will hit a
terminal point of cap
On Apr 17, 2009, at 3:56 PM, Stephen wrote:
anyone here using a SAN and if so what are they using, maybe some of
the points that sold you on it? or i fyou hate it why?
it would be nic to have real world thoughts on it instead of all the
markey speak...
Could you elaborate on the requirements
anyone here using a SAN and if so what are they using, maybe some of
the points that sold you on it? or i fyou hate it why?
it would be nic to have real world thoughts on it instead of all the
markey speak...
--
A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from
rolling over
13 matches
Mail list logo
