Re: Stupid question on suspend/resume and command-line FTP

2008-02-12 Thread Charles Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I use a home-brew backup script that basically loops through some > directories, grabbing a wad of files, tar/gzip them up, and FTP the > result to a distant server. To minimize space footprint, it deletes > the file after FTP finishes, but it's a very primitive setup

Re: Stupid question on suspend/resume and command-line FTP

2008-02-12 Thread Matrix Mole
On Feb 12, 2008 6:13 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Agreed :-) I just glanced over your email, but you do know about > screen right? > > Wasn't that the thing that let you run multiple windows in a > command-line terminal? Correct. Screen is really awesome. I almost refuse to use any shell th

Re: Stupid question on suspend/resume and command-line FTP

2008-02-12 Thread fouldragon
>Default number of TCP retries is 6 in exponential backoff and should >time out after a few minutes. That's how long you have to >resynchronize your TCP stream before the other end destroys the >session... Ten panicked seconds shouldn't be a problem then. >TCP ensures that data is not corrupted

Re: Stupid question on suspend/resume and command-line FTP

2008-02-12 Thread Kristian Erik Hermansen
On Feb 12, 2008 4:41 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1- If I left it for a while instead of a few panicked seconds, it > would timeout and drop the connection, ending FTP and moving on to the > next file. This would result in a lost file. Default number of TCP retries is 6 in exponential backo

Stupid question on suspend/resume and command-line FTP

2008-02-12 Thread fouldragon
I use a home-brew backup script that basically loops through some directories, grabbing a wad of files, tar/gzip them up, and FTP the result to a distant server. To minimize space footprint, it deletes the file after FTP finishes, but it's a very primitive setup-- no error catching and retryin