http://wiki.openwrt.org/TableOfHardware
Obnosis | (503)754-4452
PLUG Linux Security Labs 2nd Saturday Each mo...@noon - 3PM
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:45:11 -0700
Subject: Re: WRT54G questions
From: lthiels...@gmail.com
To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Stephen wrote:
> While on this thread, has anyone found a Wireless N router that might
> Play nice with any of the ddwrt/tomato/openwrt?
>
> One of the folks at the installfest likes to use the Linksys WRT-350N which
also includes a gigabit switch and a USB port
While on this thread, has anyone found a Wireless N router that might
Play nice with any of the ddwrt/tomato/openwrt?
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Joe Fleming wrote:
> Version number is everything with the G's. All of the newer ones (past
> few years) all use a different, unsupported chip an
Version number is everything with the G's. All of the newer ones (past
few years) all use a different, unsupported chip and now all run VxWorks
instead of Linux. Versions from 5.0 on all come with VxWorks in fact,
though it looks like you can use VxWorks Killer on some of the newer
models and run L
Wow! What a lot of posts! Thanks to all who responded--looks like I
have several things to try.
FWIW, my WRT54G has a space then a V8 following the model number, so I
guess that it's a version 8. It also responds to a ping to 192.168.1.1.
Thanks again!
-mj-
Charles Lewton wrote:
I notice
Alex Dean wrote:
>
> On Mar 17, 2009, at 7:54 AM, Dazed_75 wrote:
>
>> My recollection (frequently poor) is that the version number is te
>> important part as Linksys went to a cost saving reduced memory size in
>> version 5 and that is why it became so lame. The upsurge of people
>> wanting
I noticed this link while looking at a Netgear router I saw at Fry's.
http://www.myopenrouter.com/
Chuck
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> I know that there is a WRT54GL model as well. Is the WRT54G capable of
> running various WRT firmwares like the GL model?
>
> Also, th
Hmmm. I have a v2.1 that I'm using locally (on IPCop orange for in-house
internet access), and a v3.1 which was given to me after it no longer
was able to pick up an IP address from Cox (dhcp issue). I was thinking
of perhaps toying with the v3.1.
Dazed_75 wrote:
> My recollection (frequently p
On Mar 17, 2009, at 7:54 AM, Dazed_75 wrote:
My recollection (frequently poor) is that the version number is te
important part as Linksys went to a cost saving reduced memory size
in version 5 and that is why it became so lame. The upsurge of
people wanting to flash other firmware caused
My recollection (frequently poor) is that the version number is te important
part as Linksys went to a cost saving reduced memory size in version 5 and
that is why it became so lame. The upsurge of people wanting to flash other
firmware caused the release of the GL model with I believe is nothing
MOst G models I have seen users with are version 5. These seem to be
difficult to do anything with ; they can't run firmwares like tomato, just
the light version of dd-wrt.
I'm stuck with a G.
This is all iirc.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> I know that there is a WRT5
I know that there is a WRT54GL model as well. Is the WRT54G capable of
running various WRT firmwares like the GL model?
Also, there a slew of different WRT54G versions (hardware). How
significant are the variations is versions WRT (with respect to) free
firmware replacements?
--
-Eric 'shubes
12 matches
Mail list logo
