RE: Which EMail reader for BIG volumes of mail?

2009-04-14 Thread Craig White
n...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > [mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of Alan > Dayley > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:31 PM > To: Main PLUG discussion list > Subject: Re: Which EMail reader for BIG volumes of mail? > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:59 PM

Re: Which EMail reader for BIG volumes of mail?

2009-04-14 Thread Charles Jones
Alan Dayley Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:31 PM To: Main PLUG discussion list Subject: Re: Which EMail reader for BIG volumes of mail? On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Craig White wrote: Evolution looks/feels like Outlook which may provide comfort. I have used it for many years an

RE: Which EMail reader for BIG volumes of mail?

2009-04-14 Thread Bryan O'Neal
- From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us [mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of Alan Dayley Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:31 PM To: Main PLUG discussion list Subject: Re: Which EMail reader for BIG volumes of mail? On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Craig

Re: Which EMail reader for BIG volumes of mail?

2009-04-11 Thread Stephen
Honetly gmail has some advantages in this as a central collection point then useing its imap to connect your email client Best of both of these I think ? On 4/9/09, Charles Jones wrote: > Eric Shubert wrote: >> Craig White wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 17:20 -0700, Jim March wrote: >>> >>

Re: Which EMail reader for BIG volumes of mail?

2009-04-09 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 19:39 -0700, Charles Jones wrote: > I know this probably sounds like a commercial for Google, but you can > easily setup a gmail account to fetch mail from other mailboxes, and > then use the gmail web interface as well as access gmail via IMAP. > That way if there is a 2GB i

Re: Which EMail reader for BIG volumes of mail?

2009-04-09 Thread Alan Dayley
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Craig White wrote: > > Evolution looks/feels like Outlook which may provide comfort. I have > used it for many years and I'm comfortable with it and I am on a lot of > mail lists and often get 1000+ e-mails a day. > > I find that less important than the actual

Re: Which EMail reader for BIG volumes of mail?

2009-04-09 Thread JD Austin
I moved from running several servers to hosted google.. lovin in! -- JD Austin Twin Geckos Technology Services LLC j...@twingeckos.com 480.288.8195x201 http://www.twingeckos.com Norman Mailer - "Writing books is the closest men ever

Re: Which EMail reader for BIG volumes of mail?

2009-04-09 Thread Charles Jones
Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 17:20 -0700, Jim March wrote: When I mean "big", I mean out past 2gig in a matter of a few days. I have somebody who wants to convert who is likely THE biggest EMail volume user that anybody's ever seen. And somebody literal

Re: Which EMail reader for BIG volumes of mail?

2009-04-09 Thread Eric Shubert
Craig White wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 17:20 -0700, Jim March wrote: >> When I mean "big", I mean out past 2gig in a matter of a few days. I >> have somebody who wants to convert who is likely THE biggest EMail >> volume user that anybody's ever seen. And somebody literally famous >> enough t

Re: Which EMail reader for BIG volumes of mail?

2009-04-09 Thread Ted Gould
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 17:59 -0700, Craig White wrote: > Evolution looks/feels like Outlook which may provide comfort. I have > used it for many years and I'm comfortable with it and I am on a lot of > mail lists and often get 1000+ e-mails a day. I don't get quite that amount of mail, but I spend

Re: Which EMail reader for BIG volumes of mail?

2009-04-09 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 17:20 -0700, Jim March wrote: > When I mean "big", I mean out past 2gig in a matter of a few days. I > have somebody who wants to convert who is likely THE biggest EMail > volume user that anybody's ever seen. And somebody literally famous > enough that if she jumps to Linux

Re: Which EMail reader for BIG volumes of mail?

2009-04-09 Thread Charles Jones
My only suggestion is that Thunderbird is 3x more stable than Evolution in my experience. In fact, I have NEVER had Thunderbird crash or hang, just take a long time downloading headers of a huge mailbox, which you cannot really avoid unless you have a GbE connection to the mailserver. I re-try

Which EMail reader for BIG volumes of mail?

2009-04-09 Thread Jim March
When I mean "big", I mean out past 2gig in a matter of a few days. I have somebody who wants to convert who is likely THE biggest EMail volume user that anybody's ever seen. And somebody literally famous enough that if she jumps to Linux, the news will make Digg and Reddit in a matter of days. S