Re: clam tk

2010-05-05 Thread betty
Craig White wrote: On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 07:52 -0700, betty wrote: well, no, of course i am not running anything complicated (surely you jest !) as you know my non-existent level of expertise. the primary reason why i got the program, and it is running fine (i guess, how would i know?) is t

Re: clam tk

2010-05-04 Thread Craig White
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 07:52 -0700, betty wrote: > well, no, of course i am not running anything complicated (surely you > jest !) as you know my non-existent level of expertise. the primary > reason why i got the program, and it is running fine (i guess, how would > i know?) is that after 10 yea

Re: clam tk

2010-05-04 Thread Lisa Kachold
window (if it's >>>> *very* recent, many distros are behind in this) via advanced|schedule. >>>> If you prefer using a GUI, you might also look at klamav, which is a KDE >>>> frontend for clam. Be warned klamav brings in dazuko and does on-access >

Re: clam tk

2010-05-03 Thread betty
s probably not needed for Linux systems, and may be harmful to system performance and stability. ==Joseph++ betty wrote: stupid question alert; please do not read if you have no patience. I am using clamAV and clam tk, (3.05) so that i can use the gui. it's supposed to have automatic upd

Re: clam tk

2010-05-03 Thread James Finstrom
te frequency from the clamtk window (if it's >>>> *very* recent, many distros are behind in this) via advanced|schedule. >>>> If you prefer using a GUI, you might also look at klamav, which is a >>>> KDE frontend for clam. Be warned klamav brings in dazuk

Re: clam tk

2010-05-02 Thread Joseph Sinclair
tend for clam. Be warned klamav brings in dazuko and does >>> on-access scanning, which is probably not needed for Linux systems, >>> and may be harmful to system performance and stability. >>> >>> ==Joseph++ >>> betty wrote: >>>> stupi

Re: clam tk

2010-05-02 Thread kitepi...@kitepilot.com
ings in dazuko and does on-access scanning, which is probably not needed for Linux systems, and may be harmful to system performance and stability. ==Joseph++ betty wrote: stupid question alert; please do not read if you have no patience. I am using clamAV and clam tk, (3.05) so that

Re: clam tk

2010-05-02 Thread betty
and may be harmful to system performance and stability. ==Joseph++ betty wrote: stupid question alert; please do not read if you have no patience. I am using clamAV and clam tk, (3.05) so that i can use the gui. it's supposed to have automatic updates, how will i know if it is updating

Re: clam tk

2010-05-02 Thread Joseph Sinclair
ch is probably not needed for Linux systems, and may be harmful to system performance and stability. ==Joseph++ betty wrote: > stupid question alert; please do not read if you have no patience. > > I am using clamAV and clam tk, (3.05) so that i can use the gui. > it's supp

Re: clam tk

2010-05-02 Thread Stephen
am using clamAV and clam tk, (3.05) so that i can use the gui. > it's supposed to have automatic updates, how will i know if it is updating > it's signatures? [using a gui] > does it run itself automatically or do i need to do that every so often? > thanks agai

clam tk

2010-05-02 Thread betty
stupid question alert; please do not read if you have no patience. I am using clamAV and clam tk, (3.05) so that i can use the gui. it's supposed to have automatic updates, how will i know if it is updating it's signatures? [using a gui] does it run itself automatically or do i need