Mike,
You may already have tiff2pdf installed which is a command line tool that will
convert a tiff image to pdf document.
Dennis Kibbe
On Friday, September 07, 2012 01:20:19 PM Michael Havens wrote:
I need this program to run gscan2pdf.
SNIP
:-)~MIKE~(-:
gscan2pdf was working.
-f
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
perlmagick
Suggested packages:
imagemagick-doc
The following NEW packages will be installed:
perlmagick
0 upgraded, 1 newly
'?
What does 'traceroute -n archive.ubuntu.com' say?
Also, let's look at apt. have you used synaptic (it's a gui over apt-get
and friends)? Try that, tell it to update the files list, select
perlmagick to install, say 'apply', and see what happens.
Also, what version of ubuntu are you
discussion list
Subject: Re: perlmagick
Okay
Yes, I am connected to the internet. How do I know this? Because I'm
talking to you.
There no proxy.
Do I have a default root? I don't think so?
ping inficad.com
PING inficad.com (216.19.223.17) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from www.getnet.net
:* plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us [mailto:
plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] *On Behalf Of *Michael
Havens
*Sent:* Friday, September 07, 2012 1:53 PM
*To:* Main PLUG discussion list
*Subject:* Re: perlmagick
** **
Okay
Yes, I am connected
:* Friday, September 07, 2012 1:53 PM
*To:* Main PLUG discussion list
*Subject:* Re: perlmagick
** **
Okay
Yes, I am connected to the internet. How do I know this? Because I'm
talking to you.
There no proxy.
Do * I *have a default root? I don't think so?
ping
Apparently the Ubuntu apt database changed such that the reference was
no longer valid. Maybe they moved where it lived, or something like
that (since I think the package name stayed the same, I'm guessing it
moved paths)
Subject: Re: perlmagick
my BIG (rhetorical) question is: why did
I addressed the apt-get errors with legacy debian sarge and etch in the
following ways:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Lisa Kachold lisakach...@obnosis.comwrote:
0) Evidently the 4.1 gcc could not build PerlMagick.
snip
1) Debian sarge could have been updated to etch, and full apt-get
0) Evidently the 4.1 gcc could not build PerlMagick.
Does anyone have an sarge or etch system with gcc 4.2 who can build be the
package in a directory, then tar.gz for me?
1) Debian sarge could have been updated to etch, and full apt-get package
updates competed at some point in the past