Like mots of the other threads on PLUG, this is alo leading to nowhere.
To be very true i donot disagree with AG. I wanted to take this up sometime.
Rather than going deep in thread and answering the posts that talk abt
nuthing good i will stick to the original issue raised in first mail.
Note : My
> > > I know that messages get rejected just because the reply starts at the
> > > top rather than *after* the original post (which in itself is
> > > ridiculous rule, but I respect it none-the-less)
> >
> > Why is it ridiculous ?
>
> because most standard mail clients, like outlook as well as gma
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RTFM
I quote verbatim, "This instruction is usually given in response to a
question that can be answered easily by reading relevant documentation,
and suggests that the inquirer may be wasting people's time." Please
understand, it is extremely irritating to an
On 8/12/05, Desi Penguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/11/05, Swapnil Nagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I know that messages get rejected just because the reply starts at the
> > > top rather than *after* the original post (which in itself is
> > > ridiculous rule, but I respect it none-th
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
A: No.
Q: Should I leave quotations after my reply?
More in the proper place.
On 8/12/05, Desi Penguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On 8/11/05, Swapnil Nagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know that messages get rejected just because the reply starts at the
> > top rather than *after* the original post (which in itself is
> > ridiculous rule, but I respect it none-the-less)
>
> Why is it ridiculous ?
because most standard m
I know that messages get rejected just because the reply starts at the
top rather than *after* the original post (which in itself is
ridiculous rule, but I respect it none-the-less)
Why is it ridiculous ?
--Swapnil
--
__
Pune G
> If this LUG was helpful I would have been one of the
> 1st person to ask help for the demo. But the attitude
> of these so-called gurus is a big turn off.
I got a similar feedback from my colleauges who have also subscribed
to this mailing list. I'm sure *all* of members are not like thse, but
w
Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for your concern about the meeting and related activities
> >
> > -Sudhanwa
> >
> > ps: Hey, I liked this " linuxdominatrix" I am an Asterix fan.
> > Probably, I can use " Pluggix Co-ordinatrix" below my name :-)
>
> When did i say that i did not get things
Well, I never
Dont expect this from this LUG. When any newbie asks a
question, rather than getting an answer he is
rediculed.
RTFM is the answer that the person gets and his
knowledge is rediculed.
RTFM term itself is so very arrogant, i-care-a-damn
and geekish one. Let the members 1st learn to use RTM.
http://e
> People are absolutely free to talk about almost anything related to
> FS/OS ( free s/w, OSS) in the PLUG meetings. Normally, I put up a mail
> well in advance, asking people to suggest topics for discussions.
> Somehow, hardly any suggestions come up. If you feel a need for
> something to be disc
When I was in US, I was member of local LUG (That was almost 5 yrs ago)
There we conducted couple of installfests.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Installfest)
It was nice to help people to install various distributions, and work
closely with fellow LUG members.
This could be good PR for PLUG, we ca
Hi,
On 8/8/05, Rohan Dighe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Isn't there a way so that all plug members could work to get a
> messenger running so that there can be on the spot interaction !!
> Please if there is some action taking place i would like to get into it !!
Devendra has already
Hi,
--- Rohan Dighe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't there a way so that all plug members could
> work to get a
> messenger running so that there can be on the spot
> interaction !!
> Please if there is some action taking place i would
> like to get into it !!
There is a channel on IRC where
Hey,
Isn't there a way so that all plug members could work to get a
messenger running so that there can be on the spot interaction !!
Please if there is some action taking place i would like to get into it !!
Also,
As of Yesterday's meeting i feel that many of the 1st timers yesterday
were re
15 matches
Mail list logo
