Manas Alekar wrote:
> Are you sure ? The touchpad, function keys ... everything ? Also, is this
> with the Sulphur release ?
Support has been there right from the Fedora Core 6 release but spotty.
Over the last couple of releases, it is much better but still imperfect.
Touchpad afaik works. Fu
Are you sure ? The touchpad, function keys ... everything ? Also, is this
with the Sulphur release ?
Cheers,
Manas
--
__
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: (plug-mail@plug.org.in)
List Information: http://plug.org.in/c
Manas Alekar wrote:
> One more question, totally unrelated to package managers, but relevant.
>
> When are the major distributions going to start supporting MacBooks ?
Fedora already does.
Rahul
--
__
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group
One more question, totally unrelated to package managers, but relevant.
When are the major distributions going to start supporting MacBooks ?
~Manas
--
__
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: (plug-mail@plug.org.in)
List
Vidyadhar Gadgil wrote:
>
> This is one viewpoint I agree with. I used apt on Fedora 3, but
> when I switched to Fedora 5, apt had been discontinued, and I was
> forced to switch to yum.
Seems incorrect. It has been in the repository from early on and don't
recall it ever being dropped.
http:
> Subject: Re: [PLUG] Fedora 9 (Sulphur) Released
> To: "Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List"
> *This is not a smart comment.*
> Why did Fedora chose to go the yum way instead of using apt with rpm ? Apt
> is quite matured. I use Fedora and Debian on a regular basis,
Manas Alekar wrote:
> *This is not a smart comment.*
> Why did Fedora chose to go the yum way instead of using apt with rpm ? Apt
> is quite matured. I use Fedora and Debian on a regular basis, and somehow,
> apt seems way mature than yum.
>
> I can understand the spirit of doing it again, and doi
*This is not a smart comment.*
Why did Fedora chose to go the yum way instead of using apt with rpm ? Apt
is quite matured. I use Fedora and Debian on a regular basis, and somehow,
apt seems way mature than yum.
I can understand the spirit of doing it again, and doing it in python for
porting eleg
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Pranav Peshwe wrote:
Cool!
Are there any improvements in yum ?
Sure. Yum performance continues to improve and this release has a much
better version.
http://skvidal.wordpress.com/page/2/
The specific link is
http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/yum-results/
Nishit Dave wrote:
I, for one, would like to see a better way to manage network connections and
proxies through a single environmental setting interface.
You would have to convert that it a more detailed request for
enhancement and file it in http://bugzilla.redhat.com.
Rahul
--
__
Pranav Peshwe wrote:
Cool!
Are there any improvements in yum ?
Sure. Yum performance continues to improve and this release has a much
better version.
http://skvidal.wordpress.com/page/2/
Also you have a yum reinstall option to reinstall packages easily for
whatever reasons. The multi-
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Pranav Peshwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Cool!
>
> Are there any improvements in yum ?
>
The release notes say that the new package manager, PackageKit, which is a
replacement for Pirut and Pup has an improved yum as its backend.
I, for one, would like to see
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Get It:
>
> http://get.fedoraproject.org/
>
> Official Announcement:
>
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-May/msg7.html
>
> Press Release:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarc
Hi,
Get It:
http://get.fedoraproject.org/
Official Announcement:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-May/msg7.html
Press Release:
http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2008/fedora9.html
Few words from the current Fedora Project Leader, Paul W. Frields:
https:
14 matches
Mail list logo
