Another difference is that SoftSqueeze is written in java, which is an
interpreted language rather then a native one. So in theory, once
again, memory and processor load for SqueezeSlave should be lower, ie.
it doesn't need any JIT compiler to be running in the back.
--
Heimiko
Transporter ->
SoftSqueeze is written in Java, while Squeezeslave is in C. SoftSqueeze will
cary it's display code around even if you don't use it. Thus the overall memory
and CPU consumption of Squeezeslave can be expected to be lower.
Michael
___
plugins mailing li
Very little documentation is available ...
--
rlsx
rlsx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12092
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=39292
_