Re: [pmacct-discussion] Flexible aggregation

2009-06-14 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Karl, On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 04:30:07PM -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > A good database should not have problems with simultaneous updates, > or is there another reason why synchronization is an issue? No, not really - expecially when it's down to an INSERTs-only scenario. Just an effort to hel

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Flexible aggregation

2009-06-14 Thread Chris Wilson
Hi Paolo and Karl, On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Paolo Lucente wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 03:07:01PM -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > > >> We are only interested in a single table. > > > > Why can't two separate sql plugins write to the same table? > > What Karl is proposing here might really result i

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Flexible aggregation

2009-06-14 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Chris, On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 02:25:10PM +0300, Chris Wilson wrote: > I don't think it can. For example, how would we write the configuration? > Let's say we just want to zero (not aggregate on) the destination IP for > flows less than 1000 bytes. We could try: > > plugins: mysql[with_ds