Hi Paolo,
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Paolo Lucente wrote:
Yes, that's intended for a couple of reasons: 1) don't expect to release
any more table versions: you see that already happening with recently
introduced primitives; idea is to stick to a table version (or style
nowadays) and then customize i
Hi Chris,
Yes, that's intended for a couple of reasons: 1) don't expect to release any
more table versions: you see that already happening with recently introduced
primitives; idea is to stick to a table version (or style nowadays) and then
customize it from there, adding (or removing) fields to t
Hi Paolo,
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Paolo Lucente wrote:
To say this work (as agreed in the shape of sql table version 8) has
been just committed to the CVS. Please give it a try and let me know if
it seems to work to your eyes.
Thanks for this. I haven't compiled it yet, but I noticed this line:
Hi Chris,
To say this work (as agreed in the shape of sql table version 8) has
been just committed to the CVS. Please give it a try and let me know
if it seems to work to your eyes.
Cheers,
Paolo
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:14:18AM +0200, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We just had a bug repo
