Re: [pmacct-discussion] Sflow !

2010-12-29 Thread Andreas Larsen
Ok thanks for the clarification. The config file you see is actually all I have now in debug purpose. I have nothing else in the file. When I run sfacctd with the debug bgp_daemon_msglog I do get a lot of information like the one described below. sfacctd -f /etc/pmacct/sfacctd.conf -p /tmp/t

Re: [pmacct-discussion] potentially missing data

2010-12-29 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Tony, Good to know issue is solved. I can say pmacct doesn't make use at any rate of shared memory segments that can be attached by distinct (say, nfacctd) instances. Also, correct behaviour from the underlying OS when trying to bind two processes to the same port is to get an error back. Puzz

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Sflow !

2010-12-29 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Andreas, OK, sFlow datagrams are getting to the collector; from the previous email it seems BGP information is also getting through no problems. You don't daemonize the process, don't enable debug and comment out bgp_daemon_msglog - and as a result, don't get anything anymore on the terminal: s

Re: [pmacct-discussion] potentially missing data

2010-12-29 Thread Tony
Hi Paolo, This is with the normal nfacctd running (that is gathering my real stats): # ps -ef | grep acct root 9255 1 0 Dec24 ?00:00:09 nfacctd: Core Process [default] root 9256 9255 0 Dec24 ?00:00:18 nfacctd: MySQL Plugin [internet] root 29235 29205 0 11:12