Hi!
Attached is a patch against pmacctd that allows you to specify a
specific PF_PACKET protocol to capture, using the following option:
pcap_protocol: 0xdead
This functionality depends on an extension to libpcap which is not in
mainline libpcap (yet), so I've attached the corresponding
h merged into libpcap, and if that's successful, I'll
report back here.
Cheers,
Lennert
> Paolo
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 05:10:29PM +0300, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Attached is a patch against pmacctd that allows you
Hi again!
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 05:15:33PM +0300, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> > I'd be curious what is your strategy to move this forward, especially on
> > the libpcap side. If it makes any convenient to you, we can indeed merge
> > the pmacct part - since it
ort to something a-la MySQL (since they also do have a
> mysql-config thing and only in 5.7 added pkg-config support):
>
> https://github.com/pmacct/pmacct/blob/master/m4/ax_lib_mysql.m4
>
> Paolo
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:59:34PM +0300, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> &g
ve to resort to something a-la MySQL (since they also do have a
> > > mysql-config thing and only in 5.7 added pkg-config support):
> > >
> > > https://github.com/pmacct/pmacct/blob/master/m4/ax_lib_mysql.m4
> > >
> > > Paolo
> > >
> >
e on the same page and i'm
> just awaiting for your PR on GitHub. Thanks Vincent as always for your
> input.
>
> Paolo
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 05:15:12PM +0300, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> > Hi Paolo,
> >
> > Well, that's how it's in the
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 02:52:42PM +0100, Job Snijders wrote:
> REQUEST TO THE PMACCT CONTRIBUTOR COMMUNITY
> ---
>
> If you have contributed to the pmacct project (your name may be listed
> below), please consider a reply-all to this email express
e, but at the same time we don't wish to litigate.
> >Instead of getting infringers to change their behavior, relicensing
> >the project could be another way to resolve the potential for
> >conflict: we see benefits to removing rules we don't plan on
> >