[pmacct-discussion] [RFC] Patches to allow capturing specific PF_PACKET protocols

2017-06-30 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
Hi! Attached is a patch against pmacctd that allows you to specify a specific PF_PACKET protocol to capture, using the following option: pcap_protocol: 0xdead This functionality depends on an extension to libpcap which is not in mainline libpcap (yet), so I've attached the corresponding

Re: [pmacct-discussion] [RFC] Patches to allow capturing specific PF_PACKET protocols

2017-07-03 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
h merged into libpcap, and if that's successful, I'll report back here. Cheers, Lennert > Paolo > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 05:10:29PM +0300, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Attached is a patch against pmacctd that allows you

Re: [pmacct-discussion] [RFC] Patches to allow capturing specific PF_PACKET protocols

2017-08-30 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
Hi again! On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 05:15:33PM +0300, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > > I'd be curious what is your strategy to move this forward, especially on > > the libpcap side. If it makes any convenient to you, we can indeed merge > > the pmacct part - since it&#x

Re: [pmacct-discussion] [RFC] Patches to allow capturing specific PF_PACKET protocols

2017-08-30 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
ort to something a-la MySQL (since they also do have a > mysql-config thing and only in 5.7 added pkg-config support): > > https://github.com/pmacct/pmacct/blob/master/m4/ax_lib_mysql.m4 > > Paolo > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:59:34PM +0300, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > &g

Re: [pmacct-discussion] [RFC] Patches to allow capturing specific PF_PACKET protocols

2017-08-30 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
ve to resort to something a-la MySQL (since they also do have a > > > mysql-config thing and only in 5.7 added pkg-config support): > > > > > > https://github.com/pmacct/pmacct/blob/master/m4/ax_lib_mysql.m4 > > > > > > Paolo > > > > >

Re: [pmacct-discussion] [RFC] Patches to allow capturing specific PF_PACKET protocols

2017-08-30 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
e on the same page and i'm > just awaiting for your PR on GitHub. Thanks Vincent as always for your > input. > > Paolo > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 05:15:12PM +0300, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > > Hi Paolo, > > > > Well, that's how it's in the

Re: [pmacct-discussion] effort to relicense pmacct from GPL to a BSD-style license

2020-01-08 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
Hello! On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 02:52:42PM +0100, Job Snijders wrote: > REQUEST TO THE PMACCT CONTRIBUTOR COMMUNITY > --- > > If you have contributed to the pmacct project (your name may be listed > below), please consider a reply-all to this email express

Re: [pmacct-discussion] effort to relicense pmacct from GPL to a BSD-style license

2020-01-08 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
e, but at the same time we don't wish to litigate. > >Instead of getting infringers to change their behavior, relicensing > >the project could be another way to resolve the potential for > >conflict: we see benefits to removing rules we don't plan on > >