Re: [pmacct-discussion] pcap/ulog performance on Linux

Hi Vincent, Inline: On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 11:06:39AM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > > Can I add it through the use of libnetfilter-log? Or do you want it > > without any external dependencies? I already did a couple of daemons > > with libnetfilter-log. First off, it would be wonderful if

Re: [pmacct-discussion] pcap/ulog performance on Linux

❦ 29 février 2016 19:30 +0100, Vincent Bernat  : >> You are right with your assumption. Support of NFLOG has been requested, >> ie. to support IPv6, but is still pending and i don't have it currently >> on my radar (ie. 1.6.0 / 1.6.1). > > Can I add it through the use of

Re: [pmacct-discussion] pcap/ulog performance on Linux

❦ 29 février 2016 18:12 GMT, Paolo Lucente  : > You are right with your assumption. Support of NFLOG has been requested, > ie. to support IPv6, but is still pending and i don't have it currently > on my radar (ie. 1.6.0 / 1.6.1). Can I add it through the use of

Re: [pmacct-discussion] pcap/ulog performance on Linux

Hi Vincent, You are right with your assumption. Support of NFLOG has been requested, ie. to support IPv6, but is still pending and i don't have it currently on my radar (ie. 1.6.0 / 1.6.1). Cheers, Paolo On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 05:55:51PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ??? 26 f??vrier 2016

Re: [pmacct-discussion] pcap/ulog performance on Linux

❦ 26 février 2016 17:53 +0100, Vincent Bernat  : > Has someone already done some simple benchmarks to check the performance > of libpcap-based capture with libpcap >= 1.0.0 (mmap support) and Linux > kernel >= 2.6.27 (64bit support). There is another milestone which is > libpcap

[pmacct-discussion] pcap/ulog performance on Linux

Hey! Has someone already done some simple benchmarks to check the performance of libpcap-based capture with libpcap >= 1.0.0 (mmap support) and Linux kernel >= 2.6.27 (64bit support). There is another milestone which is libpcap >= 1.5 and Linux kernel >= 3.10 (support for TPACKET_V3)? How would