Line 53: $vpage = ReadPage($vname); @$loaded[$vname]++;
Should be: $vpage = ReadPage($vname, READPAGE_CURRENT); @$loaded[$vname]++;
Since only the page text is accessed, it's inefficient to load the
whole page array.
BTW, is this the best way to mention minor bugs and inconveniences like this?
Hello All,
in addition to the ongoing discussion about the beginner
documentation:
What do you think about preloading the sandbox with examples of the
basic markup?
This way a newbie had a documenting starting point for his first
steps.
Oliver
--
Oliver Betz, Muenchen (oliverbetz.de)
Mark Paterson wrote:
I wondered if a newbie opinion would be useful in thinking of what to put on
this page.
newbie opinions are exactly the kind of information needed.
My first day using PmWiki I got stuck because I had no idea how to get
started. So I went to Google and found a link to the
- The following is an automated response
- to your message generated on behalf of philippe.kr...@thalesgroup.com
Bonjour, je suis en congé entre le 13/02/09 midi et le 22/02/09 au
soir. Je lirais probablement mes mails de temps en temps, mais en cas
d'urgence, vous pouvez me
Original message from John Rankin:
[snip]
I have another question: should ! for a heading 1 be included?
I left it out; Peter added it. There are arguments for and against.
What led me to leave it out is that there is no gui button for h1.
JR
I asked this myself a while back. The answer I
Sounds comparatively unobtrusive to me.
David
Eemeli Aro eem...@gmail.com 2/18/2009 4:15 PM
Together, these changes will allow the easiest and least intrusive way
for people to indicate their usage of a cookbook recipe, as well as
the presentation of that information. For more in-depth
Hi All once again! :-)
As far as I can see (understand) Wikiforms works with PTV as definition
List [ example-- :PTVname: PTVValue ] . I have a system where instead
of using the markup of wikiform I'd like using ZAP forms (More Flexible, but
keep using the wikilist). The problem arrises
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:15:06PM +0200, Eemeli Aro wrote:
1. Add a new 'Users:' title as the last in the recipeinfo box on
Cookbook.Template. This can then be added to other recipes
organically, and should become a comma-delimited list of users of the
recipe. A link to a profile page is
Brent Marshall wrote:
not survive too many edits. One might get around this with some
mechanism to periodically restore the sandbox to a basic state that
included the examples.
That's actually what happens today -- the sandbox is purged every 15
minutes.
~ ~ Dave
Chris Cox wrote:
If you have a Rating Group per cookbook, then create authored pages
under the group if you like it/use it. A pagelist count could
be shown on the cookbook page.
A separate page per cookbook (or even a group) with a name per line
sounds like a good idea. Kind of like the
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 14:46 -0500, DaveG wrote:
Chris Cox wrote:
If you have a Rating Group per cookbook, then create authored pages
under the group if you like it/use it. A pagelist count could
be shown on the cookbook page.
A separate page per cookbook (or even a group) with a name per
Ignore this if it's off the wall, since I haven't followed this
thread, but why not just do this:
On the Recipe page:
Rating: (: some directive - new or existing - that presents a summary
based on the information in the Talk page :)
[[{*$FullName}-Talk|View discussion]] |
Randy Brown wrote:
A Talk page seems like an appropriate place to put opinions, and isn't
that what a rating is? This way we can have free form discussion as well
as a way to present a summary of the sentiment. The rating could be a
single metric or multiple metrics (opinions of casual
Three arguments for putting recipe ratings and discussion on a Talk
page:
1. It encourages discussion about the recipe. I hate to clutter
documentation with insider comments. But on a Talk page, I'd feel
freer to say what I think - even if it's a minor point or something
I'm not sure
2009/2/20 DaveG pmw...@solidgone.com:
The summary of the rating should definitely be on the cookbook page. I think
the actual ratings should go somewhere else though (like the Talk page).
To clarify my own position, I'm not actually advocating for rating
recipes, but for listing the users of a
Eemeli Aro wrote:
2009/2/20 DaveG pmw...@solidgone.com:
To clarify my own position, I'm not actually advocating for rating
recipes, but for listing the users of a recipe. Admittedly the message
topic might be a bit misleading, as I copied it from the earlier
discussion.
Good point -- I'm
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:46:10 -0200
From: edwin marte edwin.ma...@leidba.com
Subject: [pmwiki-users] wikiform ptv change
As far as I can see (understand) Wikiforms works with PTV as definition
List [ example-- :PTVname: PTVValue ] . I have a system where instead
of using the markup of
have a lot of content here. Just a sentence or two saying Wiki is not
WYSIWYG. Instead, you edit the page and add your content. You
can do this by
I like the not WYSIWYG hint and added it to BasicEditing.
I do too. I have added it to EditingForNewcomers
hitting the edit link on the top right of
Oliver Betz wrote:
Hello All,
in addition to the ongoing discussion about the beginner
documentation:
What do you think about preloading the sandbox with examples of the
basic markup?
This way a newbie had a documenting starting point for his first
steps.
Oliver
I like having
Risner, Travis (Dublin) wrote:
Original message from John Rankin:
[snip]
I have another question: should ! for a heading 1 be included?
I left it out; Peter added it. There are arguments for and against.
What led me to leave it out is that there is no gui button for h1.
JR
I asked this
Sandy wrote:
Oliver Betz wrote:
Hello All,
in addition to the ongoing discussion about the beginner
documentation:
What do you think about preloading the sandbox with examples of the
basic markup?
This way a newbie had a documenting starting point for his first
steps.
Oliver
I like
john.ran...@affinity.co.nz wrote:
I really haven't understood why using the (:markup:) markup is so
terrible. Maybe I'm strange, but when I was first using PmWiki and
reading the documentation, I was reading the documentation, not looking
at the documentation source. It didn't even occur to
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:57:42 -0500
From: Sandy sa...@onebit.ca
Subject: Re: [pmwiki-users] Re-thinking Intro to markup pages
I really haven't understood why using the (:markup:) markup is so
terrible. Maybe I'm strange, but when I was first using PmWiki and
reading the documentation, I was
John Rankin wrote:
If people support this proposal, I will make a page for comment.
However, I will not do anything while a number of people are expressing
a strong preference for using directives on EditingForNewcomers.
I tend towards thinking that we should use (:markup:) on the Newcomers
24 matches
Mail list logo
