Re: [pmwiki-users] authuser and unprotected group or page

2009-04-24 Thread Petko Yotov
On Saturday 25 April 2009 00:59:02 Chris Lott wrote: > That works well... do you know of a way to suppress the username > request on those pages? It will be very confusing to the commenting > users who won't have a username... The login form should not appear if the password is set to @nopass. In

Re: [pmwiki-users] authuser and unprotected group or page

2009-04-24 Thread Chris Lott
That works well... do you know of a way to suppress the username request on those pages? It will be very confusing to the commenting users who won't have a username... c > > To set attributes for a Group.Page, go to [[Group.Page?action=attr]] and set > the passwords to "@nopass" (without the quot

Re: [pmwiki-users] authuser and unprotected group or page

2009-04-24 Thread Petko Yotov
On Saturday 25 April 2009 00:42:20 Chris Lott wrote: > I'm using the built-in authuser system and have it running and have > implemented a sitewide edit password using: > $DefaultPasswords['edit'] = 'id:username'; > > Is there a way to easily exclude a page or group from needing any > authenticatio

Re: [pmwiki-users] authuser and unprotected group or page

2009-04-24 Thread Chris Lott
Actually, I misspoke... what I want to do is have the site generally restricted to authenticated users but have one group (the Comments group) open to anyone with just a generic password... Essentially my thinking is to exclude the Comment group from authuser somehow and just set a group password

[pmwiki-users] authuser and unprotected group or page

2009-04-24 Thread Chris Lott
I'm using the built-in authuser system and have it running and have implemented a sitewide edit password using: $DefaultPasswords['edit'] = 'id:username'; Is there a way to easily exclude a page or group from needing any authentication? c -- Chris Lott ___

Re: [pmwiki-users] Javascript to require "Summary" for changes

2009-04-24 Thread Petko Yotov
On Friday 24 April 2009 19:17:30 Karl Schilke wrote: > Is there a simple way to add a Javascript pop-up if the Summary field > is blank? It could just display a message ("You must include a Summary > for this change") and deny the edit. Better yet, it could request the > summary text, insert it int

[pmwiki-users] pdf in includeupload/includeurl

2009-04-24 Thread Sameer Kumar
Hi,I am interested in "embedding" a pdf file uploaded to a page into the page so that the content to be available within the page. I have discovered that if I use the IncludeUrl recipe with the complete url of my upload (http://www.mysite.com/uploads/Group/Page/attachment.pdf), the browser display

Re: [pmwiki-users] Javascript to require "Summary" for changes

2009-04-24 Thread ABClf
Hi, Have a look at these pages : http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/RequireSummary http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/EditMore I guess there is also some code somewhere that automatically fill the summary field with first modified words, but I didn't find where... Gilles. _

[pmwiki-users] Javascript to require "Summary" for changes

2009-04-24 Thread Karl Schilke
I have to assume I'm not alone in that I constantly forget to enter a Summary statement when I make edits on our PmWiki. I use RCS and CVS religiously, and I suppose I got spoiled by being explicitly prompted to enter a comment. I've tried the RequireSummary cookbook, but the HTML error mes