On Monday 12 September 2011 04:02:04, Alex Riina wrote :
> http://www.pmwiki.org/
>
> > The page "" doesn't exist.
Thanks, fixed.
Petko
___
pmwiki-users mailing list
pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com
http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
http://www.pmwiki.org/
> The page "" doesn't exist.
I can't recall whether this is how things used to be or not and there is
no history, but it looks strange to have the base be a missing page.
Perhaps it should just rewrite to wiki/PmWiki/PmWiki.
__
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 08:35:59PM +0100, Forgeot Eric wrote:
> Hello,
>
> why not proposing a new default pmwiki skin?
>
> - for the default installation
> - and for the http://www.pmwiki.org website?
>
> The current one is not attractive at all (blue, underlined links), it
> looks like it was
On 09/11/2011 02:35 PM, Forgeot Eric wrote:
Hello,
why not proposing a new default pmwiki skin?
- for the default installation
- and for the http://www.pmwiki.org website?
The current one is not attractive at all (blue, underlined links), it looks
like it was designed in 1992, and therefore,
> why not triad?
While slightly better, it's still using the old fashionned blue links, and the
interface is quite complicated with all the options (for changing colors and
such), 3 columns etc.
Somethink like http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PmWiki/Skins?skin=beeblebrox-gila2 a
sober. I was more thi
Le 11/09/2011 22:14, John Rankin a écrit :
why not proposing a new default pmwiki skin?
why not triad?
jdd
___
pmwiki-users mailing list
pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com
http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
> why not proposing a new default pmwiki skin?
I support this proposal and agree with the reasons.
>
> I think a skin like this one could be great:
> http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/AlalikeSkin
This is a good starting point, but does not work very well in Safari 5.
JR
--
John Rankin
_
Hello,
why not proposing a new default pmwiki skin?
- for the default installation
- and for the http://www.pmwiki.org website?
The current one is not attractive at all (blue, underlined links), it looks
like it was designed in 1992, and therefore, it give the impression PmWiki is
backward tec