Re: [pmwiki-users] New Cookbook category for recipes that don't require server access

agreed On 15 February 2014 10:14, michael paulukonis wrote: > I'm being argumentative, but "ClientSide" could also cover Javascript > manipulation of page output, as opposed to server-side manipulation [I've > resorted to this a few times as a solution for not overriding core code]. > > -Michael

Re: [pmwiki-users] New Cookbook category for recipes that don't require server access

On 2/15/2014 12:54 PM, StefCT wrote: On 02/15/2014 03:24 PM, li...@basel-inside.ch wrote: It's not a bad idee to mark reciepes which don't need any server sided installation. I like MarkupOnly, PmwikiUsage, CoreFeatures How about some sort or ranking for the cookbooks relating to the amount o

Re: [pmwiki-users] New Cookbook category for recipes that don't require server access

On 02/15/2014 03:24 PM, li...@basel-inside.ch wrote: > It's not a bad idee to mark reciepes which don't need any server sided > installation. > I like MarkupOnly, PmwikiUsage, CoreFeatures > > But some more complex markups may be dependend on extended markups, > which must be installed. > And ther

Re: [pmwiki-users] New Cookbook category for recipes that don't require server access

It's not a bad idee to mark reciepes which don't need any server sided installation. I like MarkupOnly, PmwikiUsage, CoreFeatures But some more complex markups may be dependend on extended markups, which must be installed. And there might be some pmwiki features which first have to be activ

Re: [pmwiki-users] New Cookbook category for recipes that don't require server access

Le 14/02/2014 21:31, Simon a écrit : Perhaps "Client Side" is not that a kind of "macro" ? jdd -- http://www.dodin.org ___ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users

Re: [pmwiki-users] New Cookbook category for recipes that don't require server access

I like MarkupOnly as it is succinct. DoneByMarkup should be DoneWithMarkup to be grammatically correct but the word "done" on its own sounds a bit vulgar. MarkupOnly would be my choice. Best wishes Brian *Brian Tibbels* *IT support for small business and the individual* http://clickmarlow.co

Re: [pmwiki-users] New Cookbook category for recipes that don't require server access

The first category name that came to my mind was MarkupOnly, although DoneByMarkup might be clearer. Randy ___ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users

Re: [pmwiki-users] New Cookbook category for recipes that don't require server access

There's already a "Documentation" category for recipes that simply document tips/tricks/uses for PmWiki, so why not! I like "Markup Only" Another possibility is "Edit Access Only" or "Edit Permissions Only" or "No Admin Access" -- these could be used in the description of the category in case

Re: [pmwiki-users] New Cookbook category for recipes that don't require server access

I'm being argumentative, but "ClientSide" could also cover Javascript manipulation of page output, as opposed to server-side manipulation [I've resorted to this a few times as a solution for not overriding core code]. -Michael Paulukonis http://www.xradiograph.com Interfere

Re: [pmwiki-users] New Cookbook category for recipes that don't require server access

Perhaps "Client Side" On 15 February 2014 08:02, Peter Bowers wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 7:53 PM, StefCT wrote: > >> And how could such a category be named? "NoServerInstall"? > > > How about "PlainVanilla"? Or just "Vanilla"? Then on the main category > page it would need a bit of e

Re: [pmwiki-users] New Cookbook category for recipes that don't require server access

How about "MarkupOnlyRecipe" or "MarkupOnlyCookbook" ? "Vanilla" could mean many things to many people -- installing a php script and a single line in config.php is pretty vanilla compared to some markup-based recipes -Michael Paulukonis http://www.xradiograph.com Inte

Re: [pmwiki-users] New Cookbook category for recipes that don't require server access

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 7:53 PM, StefCT wrote: > And how could such a category be named? "NoServerInstall"? How about "PlainVanilla"? Or just "Vanilla"? Then on the main category page it would need a bit of explanation... http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/plainvanilla.asp -Peter _

[pmwiki-users] New Cookbook category for recipes that don't require server access

Hi, I'd like to add a new category to the Cookbook encompassing all recipes that can be deployed without accessing the server (by relying solely on existing PmWiki markup). What does the community think about this? And how could such a category be named? "NoServerInstall"? That's the best idea I