> > [...]
> > Anyway, my point in this is just to point out that we already do this
> with
> > pmwiki with authuser.php -- it's just a question of expanding the set of
> > recipes that are included and figuring out QA procedures and etc.
>
> Then my counter-point is that we *don't* already do this
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:35:49PM +0100, Peter Bowers wrote:
>> > > one thing is probably very important: have some way to install major
>> > > cookbooks from a drop down list or checkbox
>> >
>> > This isn't likely to happen (the drop
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:35:49PM +0100, Peter Bowers wrote:
> > > one thing is probably very important: have some way to install major
> > > cookbooks from a drop down list or checkbox
> >
> > This isn't likely to happen (the drop-down list or checkbox part),
> > because we don't want the webser
> > one thing is probably very important: have some way to install major
> > cookbooks from a drop down list or checkbox
>
> This isn't likely to happen (the drop-down list or checkbox part),
> because we don't want the webserver to have write permission to
> the cookbook/ directory.
I *think* th
On Tuesday, 20 January 2009 11:21 AM, Petko Yotov <5...@5ko.fr> wrote:
>On Monday 19 January 2009 21:44:49 John Rankin wrote:
>
>> - include a wikilib.d directory as part of each package with
>> that package's documentation; activating the package would
>> automatically look for a wikilib.d dir
On Monday 19 January 2009 21:44:49 John Rankin wrote:
> Hello Petko and please let me add my congratulations.
Thank you John!
> >Priority Checklist :
> >
> >1. Security bugfixes
> >2. Bugfixes
> >3. Documentation updates, translations
>
> I'm not clear how documentation of "bundles" will work
Th
>Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:33:16 +0100
>From: Petko Yotov <5...@5ko.fr>
>Subject: Re: [pmwiki-users] Pre-announcing 2.2.0 non-beta release, new
> release manager
>On Friday 16 January 2009 06:12:23 Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>> Petko Yotov has graciously
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 08:39:53PM +0100, jdd wrote:
>> > Priority Checklist :
>>
>> one thing is probably very important: have some way to install major
>> cookbooks from a drop down list or checkbox
>
> This isn't likely to happen (the
> This is also why PmWiki doesn't come with a web-based "installer" --
> it means that the files all get the wrong ownerships and permissions
> if done that way.
but... would it be possible to have _another_ interface w/in the
cookbook directory that could work this way? IE, something outside the
"Patrick R. Michaud" wrote:
>> one thing is probably very important: have some way to install major
>> cookbooks from a drop down list or checkbox
>
>This isn't likely to happen (the drop-down list or checkbox part),
>because we don't want the webserver to have write permission to
>the cookbook/ d
"Patrick R. Michaud" wrote:
>> Can we have a couple of popular/standard pre-packaged downloads. Such
>> as a blog, graphics, authenticity...
>
>I'm not at all opposed to providing pre-packaged downloads,
>where select recipes are included as part of the bundle.
>However, part of the issue is figur
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 08:39:53PM +0100, jdd wrote:
> > Priority Checklist :
>
> one thing is probably very important: have some way to install major
> cookbooks from a drop down list or checkbox
This isn't likely to happen (the drop-down list or checkbox part),
because we don't want the webserv
Petko Yotov a écrit :
> You can imagine how thrilled and honored I am to help out with the PmWiki
> development.
knowing your skills and friendlyness, I think this a very good thing
for us :-)
> 1. Follow the PmWiki Philosophy. These are the founding principles of the
> software, the developme
Congratulations Petko. This is a very exciting step forward.
Have fun!!
- Henrik
Petko Yotov wrote:
On Friday 16 January 2009 06:12:23 Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
Petko Yotov has graciously agreed to serve as PmWiki's "release
manager" and site maintainer.
Hello to all! :-)
You can
On Friday 16 January 2009 06:12:23 Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> Petko Yotov has graciously agreed to serve as PmWiki's "release
> manager" and site maintainer.
Hello to all! :-)
You can imagine how thrilled and honored I am to help out with the PmWiki
development. I'll probably need some time to
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 08:06:40AM +0100, jdd wrote:
> Patrick R. Michaud a écrit :
> >> two stable a year and betas monthly?
> >
> > Until we start a 2.3 version of PmWiki, I don't expect there to
> > be any more betas.
>
> what I mean is that I don't want to upgrade any month if not mandatory
>
Patrick R. Michaud a écrit :
>> two stable a year and betas monthly?
>
> Until we start a 2.3 version of PmWiki, I don't expect there to
> be any more betas.
>
> Put another way, I hope the 2.2 series remains stable for quite
> some time. Indeed, it already has :-).
>
> Pm
what I mean is that
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> I'm not at all opposed to providing pre-packaged downloads,
> where select recipes are included as part of the bundle.
> However, part of the issue is figuring out where to put them --
> if we keep them in "cookbook/", a PmWiki upgrade
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:27:47 -0600
"Patrick R. Michaud" wrote:
>
> I'm not at all opposed to providing pre-packaged downloads,
> where select recipes are included as part of the bundle.
> However, part of the issue is figuring out where to put them --
> if we keep them in "cookbook/", a PmWiki u
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 08:13:03AM -0800, pmw...@911networks.com wrote:
> I'd like to make a request / suggestion with the releases:
>
> Can we have a couple of popular/standard pre-packaged downloads. Such
> as a blog, graphics, authenticity...
I'm not at all opposed to providing pre-packaged do
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:13:03 -0800, pmw...@911networks.com wrote:
> Can we have a couple of popular/standard pre-packaged downloads. Such
> as a blog, graphics, authenticity...
Whilst I'm not sure that would work for the core + cookbooks, it's
something I intended to do for Blogger. Provide both t
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 04:20:37PM +0100, jdd wrote:
> Michael Shanley a écrit :
>
> > We might find that once a month is perfect in the long run. It feels
> > like the right amount of time to implement a few features and squash
> > bugs. Better to have fewer stable features now than have many uns
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:26:35 -0600
Ben Stallings wrote:
> Thank you, Pm, and thank you Petko!!
I'd like to make a request / suggestion with the releases:
Can we have a couple of popular/standard pre-packaged downloads. Such
as a blog, graphics, authenticity...
Let me explain: Some place wante
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:09:38AM -0500, Michael Shanley wrote:
> Maybe we can consider numbering versions as Version.Year.Month? It would imply
> we're in version 2.2.1 right now, so at least it transmits more meaningful
> information...
While I'd like to see a release every month, I'm not wanti
pmwiki-users-requ...@pmichaud.com wrote:
> Petko Yotov has graciously agreed to serve as PmWiki's "release
> manager" and site maintainer. Over the past couple of years I've
> had many opportunities to interact with Petko via email, IRC, and
> even in person, and I trust his ability to keep PmWik
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 03:09:08PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> Question: Are we talking about Petko filling two roles, or do you seem
> them as very closely integrated? (The answer later in your post seem to
> indicate the former).
I view it as two separate roles, but they're also
Michael Shanley a écrit :
> We might find that once a month is perfect in the long run. It feels
> like the right amount of time to implement a few features and squash
> bugs. Better to have fewer stable features now than have many unstable
> features for a longer period of time, right?
two stabl
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Christian Ridderström <
christian.ridderst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> firm believer in the value of time-based releases -- i.e., releases that
>> ...
>> going to let him to determine the frequency and timing to be used, but I
>> ask that we have a new release of PmWiki
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
Petko Yotov has graciously agreed to serve as PmWiki's "release manager"
and site maintainer.
That's great!
Question: Are we talking about Petko filling two roles, or do you seem
them as very closely integrated? (The answer later in your post se
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:12:23PM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> First, the headline: PmWiki 2.2.0 (non-beta) will be released
> this Sunday, January 18th. It will likely be essentially the
> current beta version of PmWiki -- potentially with some minor bugfixes
> but no other expected majo
First, the headline: PmWiki 2.2.0 (non-beta) will be released
this Sunday, January 18th. It will likely be essentially the
current beta version of PmWiki -- potentially with some minor bugfixes
but no other expected major changes from the current beta65 version.
Now, some other details:
As man
31 matches
Mail list logo
