Re: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Site-Admin group - second call

2007-06-11 Thread ThomasP
On Sun, June 3, 2007 08:51, Petko Yotov wrote: > On Sunday 03 June 2007, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: >> At present I'm expecting that upon upgrading to a Site-Admin >> version of PmWiki, PmWiki will respond by prompting the admin >> to move pages or change the configuration such that everything >> is

Re: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Site-Admin group - second call

2007-06-02 Thread Petko Yotov
On Sunday 03 June 2007, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > [1] http://www.pmichaud.com/pipermail/pmwiki-users/2007-May/043702.html > > The current plan is to create a separate "Site-Admin" group > that will hold strictly administrative pages, and that will > be read-protected by default. The existing "S

Re: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Site-Admin group - second call

2007-06-02 Thread jdd
Kathryn Andersen wrote: > Personally, I'd rather have SiteAdmin than Admin, though. Because it's > about administering the site, rather than administering other things. and think than anyday, we may have a "GroupAdmin" in groups pages... jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://gourmandises.orangeb

Re: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Site-Admin group - second call

2007-06-02 Thread IchBin
Kathryn Andersen wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 07:27:07PM -0400, Vince Administration wrote: >> I like everything about the idea except the name of the group. I >> understand where it came from, but would much prefer >> a simpler name, for example Admin, as Ryan has suggested. I realize >>

Re: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Site-Admin group - second call

2007-06-02 Thread Russ
What would the issue be of having it a wikiword (like PmWiki)? Actually, as a wikiword there would be less chance of it conflicting with a name bring used (Admin, Administration, Management, Operation, Function, Policy, System, or anything else remotely descriptive seems to have real-world app

Re: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Site-Admin group - second call

2007-06-02 Thread Tegan Dowling
On 6/2/07, Vince Administration <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Russ,SiteAdmin is Ok, since Admin seems to be in use. Although it would be nice to have a name that is not a wikiword. Any other ideas? Vince On Jun 2, 2007, at 8:28 PM, Russ wrote: I would encourage SiteAdmin (without the hy

Re: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Site-Admin group - second call

2007-06-02 Thread Vince Administration
Russ, SiteAdmin is Ok, since Admin seems to be in use. Although it would be nice to have a name that is not a wikiword. Any other ideas? Vince On Jun 2, 2007, at 8:28 PM, Russ wrote: I would encourage SiteAdmin (without the hyphen) ... I have used Admin on sites for managing conte

Re: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Site-Admin group - second call

2007-06-02 Thread Russ
I would encourage SiteAdmin (without the hyphen) ... I have used Admin on sites for managing content (members, ads, etc.) while SiteAdmin could be reserved for pages integral to the operation of PmWiki itself. Russ Jackman Content Management Systems - e-Commerce - Internet Strategy http://www.

Re: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Site-Admin group - second call

2007-06-02 Thread Kathryn Andersen
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 07:27:07PM -0400, Vince Administration wrote: > I like everything about the idea except the name of the group. I > understand where it came from, but would much prefer > a simpler name, for example Admin, as Ryan has suggested. I realize > you started with SiteAdmin, an

Re: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Site-Admin group - second call

2007-06-02 Thread Vince Administration
Patrick, I like everything about the idea except the name of the group. I understand where it came from, but would much prefer a simpler name, for example Admin, as Ryan has suggested. I realize you started with SiteAdmin, and added the hyphen for possible cluster applications, but there is no

Re: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Site-Admin group - second call

2007-06-02 Thread Ian MacGregor
On Saturday 02 June 2007 3:15:14 pm Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > I only received three direct responses to my previous > post [1] about creating a new Site-Admin group, so I wanted > to issue the call once more in case it was overlooked. > > [1] http://www.pmichaud.com/pipermail/pmwiki-users/2007

Re: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Site-Admin group - second call

2007-06-02 Thread David Cooke
ginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick R. Michaud Sent: 02 June 2007 23:15 To: pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com Subject: Re: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Site-Admin group - second call I only received three direct responses to my previous post [1] about creating a new

Re: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Site-Admin group - second call

2007-06-02 Thread Ryan R. Varick
Honestly, I don't like it because it has a hyphen in it. It's a stupid and trivial, but that's my opinion. I'd prefer something like Admin/ Ryan On 6/2/07, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I only received three direct responses to my previous > post [1] about creating a new Sit

Re: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Site-Admin group - second call

2007-06-02 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
I only received three direct responses to my previous post [1] about creating a new Site-Admin group, so I wanted to issue the call once more in case it was overlooked. [1] http://www.pmichaud.com/pipermail/pmwiki-users/2007-May/043702.html The current plan is to create a separate "Site-Admin" g