On Tue, 1 May 2007, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:19:42PM +0200, kjettil wrote:
My assessment of ZAP is now clear - thanks to the contributions over the
last 36 hours! But normally, it's a time consuming process to find out
which ones are in the rough.
I agree that it
On 5/1/07, Patrick R. Michaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This does bring up another thought... as opposed to having
ratings or voting on recipes [1], what if we called them
endorsements?
An advantage to endorsements is the ability for recipe authors to feel
out their contributors; at least
On May 2, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Sandy wrote:
Endorsements is a good word. One of the reasons I joined this list was
to get a feel for the contributors, but that's a luxury many new users
don't have. They'd still have to get a feel for the endorsers, but
more
names means more chance of
but the donations need to be pouring in for that, and from what I
hear there's not much financial backing for PmWiki.
Don't forget about http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PmWiki/SendPmMoney
I send him a minor pittance last month -- it's better than nothing!
-the Other michael
I like the idea of endorsements!
-Martin
--- Patrick R. Michaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This does bring up another thought... as opposed to
having ratings or voting on recipes [1], what if
we
called them endorsements?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
