On 10/16/07, Patrick R. Michaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 08:41:29PM -0400, drew wrote:
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 04:12:07AM -0700, Pico Ben-Amotz wrote:
Is it time to consider adding a captcha recipe?
Another stopgap measure (suggested
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 04:12:07AM -0700, Pico Ben-Amotz wrote:
Is it time to consider a new approach to dealing with spam bots
posting on pmwiki.org? There seems to be more spam than ever before
with fewer patterns in terms of ip addresses.
Since it appears that
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 08:41:29PM -0400, drew wrote:
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 04:12:07AM -0700, Pico Ben-Amotz wrote:
Is it time to consider adding a captcha recipe?
Another stopgap measure (suggested by Crisses) may be to try using
a honeypot on pmwiki.org to
Pm,
Farther down on the same digg page there was this suggesting made in
passing that might be helpful. Just a thought...
Provided you post back to the same page the easiest method is to
check the HTTP Referrer and if it's not the correct page or blank then
don't allow it, or flag it to be
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 04:12:07AM -0700, Pico Ben-Amotz wrote:
Is it time to consider a new approach to dealing with spam bots
posting on pmwiki.org? There seems to be more spam than ever before
with fewer patterns in terms of ip addresses.
Since it appears that much of the spam is being
Pico Ben-Amotz wrote:
Is it time to consider a new approach to dealing with spam bots
posting on pmwiki.org? There seems to be more spam than ever before
with fewer patterns in terms of ip addresses.
Is it time to consider adding a captcha recipe?
Pico
I very much agree, there needs to be a
Is it time to consider a new approach to dealing with spam bots
posting on pmwiki.org? There seems to be more spam than ever before
with fewer patterns in terms of ip addresses.
Is it time to consider adding a captcha recipe?
Pico
___
pmwiki-users
