Monday, March 19, 2007, 3:11:26 PM, The wrote:
> On 3/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, The Editor wrote:
>>
>> > I have been offering ZAP and Hg in the spirit of GNU, but haven't
>>
>> Umm... you mean GPL, don't you?
>>
>> /C
GNU as in GNU General Publ
On 3/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, The Editor wrote:
>
> > I have been offering ZAP and Hg in the spirit of GNU, but haven't
>
> Umm... you mean GPL, don't you?
>
> /C
oops. :)
Cheers
Dan
___
pmwiki-users
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, The Editor wrote:
I have been offering ZAP and Hg in the spirit of GNU, but haven't
Umm... you mean GPL, don't you?
/C
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr___
pmwiki-users mailing li
I have been offering ZAP and Hg in the spirit of GNU, but haven't
actually included the license in it thus far. Will try and remember
to add that to the scripts the next release.
Cheers,
Dan
On 3/19/07, Tom Lederer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 09.03.2007 um 11:19 schrieb SteP:
>
> > Hans wr
Am 09.03.2007 um 11:19 schrieb SteP:
> Hans wrote:
>
>> I wish ZAP would be written like that, even if the code doubles or
>> triples in length, and would be released as OpenSource code.
>>
>
> I didn't realize that ZAP isn't OpenSource. Question for The
> Editor, what
> are the license restrict
Hans wrote:
> I wish ZAP would be written like that, even if the code doubles or
> triples in length, and would be released as OpenSource code.
>
I didn't realize that ZAP isn't OpenSource. Question for The Editor, what
are the license restrictions then?
--SteP
__
