Re: [pocl-devel] Packaging pocl for conda-forge

2017-01-05 Thread Erik Schnetter
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Andreas Kloeckner wrote: > Erik, > > Erik Schnetter writes: >> Some long shots, assuming you already thought of the more plausible things: >> >> How clever is Conda when it replaces these strings? For example, if >> the pattern string is "placehold", and the binary

Re: [pocl-devel] Packaging pocl for conda-forge

2017-01-05 Thread Andreas Kloeckner
Erik, Erik Schnetter writes: > Some long shots, assuming you already thought of the more plausible things: > > How clever is Conda when it replaces these strings? For example, if > the pattern string is "placehold", and the binary contains the string > "placehold/include", would the "/include" su

Re: [pocl-devel] Packaging pocl for conda-forge

2017-01-05 Thread Erik Schnetter
Andreas Some long shots, assuming you already thought of the more plausible things: How clever is Conda when it replaces these strings? For example, if the pattern string is "placehold", and the binary contains the string "placehold/include", would the "/include" suffix be preserved or cut off?

[pocl-devel] Packaging pocl for conda-forge

2017-01-05 Thread Andreas Kloeckner
Hi all, I am trying to put together a conda [1] package for pocl, eventually to be uploaded to conda-forge [2]. For now, I'm packaging pocl 0.13. The intention is to use this as the approach to shipping all my CL-based software for users who may not have CL installed. In order to be able to deal w