On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Sean M. Burke wrote:
> I've just sent to CPAN a new module, Pod::Escapes. It's for resolving
> E<...> sequences.
> It contains a data table of all named (e.g., eacute, amp, inf, pi, etc.),
> and a routine for resolving numeric or named E<...> sequences.
> I wrote this since
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:36:16PM -0600, Sean M. Burke wrote:
> I think that that will have to do until Pod::* authors have the time to
> bring their modules up to spec.
I've since crossed over "to the dark side" and become one of
these pesky little pointy haired manager-types (k!).
Whi
I've just sent to CPAN a new module, Pod::Escapes. It's for resolving
E<...> sequences.
It contains a data table of all named (e.g., eacute, amp, inf, pi, etc.),
and a routine for resolving numeric or named E<...> sequences.
I wrote this since there was no authoritative, complete, and modular
rou
At 10:23 AM 2001-10-21 +0530, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
[after accepting the perlpod rewrite and perlpodspec as part of Perl]
>Does anyone want to verify that pod/*.pod complies with perlpodspec?
My current heuristic for that is to use the current version of podchecker,
and just ignore some of its
