At 07:36 AM 2001-12-11 -1000, Tim Jenness wrote:
>[...]but you still
>haven't answered my question and I stand by my statement that updating
>Pod::HTML is higher up in the priorities list than writing a new
>Pod::Parser. :-)
I will clarify: when I said that a pod2xml was the answer to "what ne
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Sean M. Burke wrote:
> At 12:09 PM 2001-12-10 -1000, Tim Jenness wrote:
> >The effort would be better spent fixing up Pod::HTML so that
> >it uses Pod::Parser.
>
> I'm so happy you've just volunteered! I'm sure you'll do a great job!
>
Very funny. As it happens I do have
At 12:09 PM 2001-12-10 -1000, Tim Jenness wrote:
>The effort would be better spent fixing up Pod::HTML so that
>it uses Pod::Parser.
I'm so happy you've just volunteered! I'm sure you'll do a great job!
--
Sean M. Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.spinn.net/~sburke/
