Re: Recent pod

2013-02-25 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Feb 24, 2013, at 12:57 PM, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > =head1 TEST > > =head2 Return values > > =over 4 > > =item undef > > The return value is undefined > > =item 0 > > The return value i numerical 0 (OK). > > =item * > > Any other value. > > =back > > =cut > -->8--- > > Now it gives m

Re: Recent pod

2013-02-25 Thread Russ Allbery
"David E. Wheeler" writes: > This was due to this change: > > https://github.com/theory/pod-simple/commit/5a01eba83824d9f91ecfae302af33fef65a8385c > Note that this is a warning, rather than a fatal error, though of course > Test::Pod considers warnings to be test failures. > In general, I t

Re: Recent pod

2013-02-25 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Feb 25, 2013, at 9:20 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > Better (since it doesn't change the formatting): > >=item 0Z<> > >=item *Z<> I think S<> would work, too. David

Re: Recent pod

2013-02-25 Thread Allison Randal
On 02/25/2013 09:26 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Feb 25, 2013, at 9:20 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > >> Better (since it doesn't change the formatting): >> >>=item 0Z<> >> >>=item *Z<> > > I think S<> would work, too. Those are all pretty weird hacks, and make for ugly Pod. Can the leve

Re: Recent pod

2013-02-25 Thread Tom Christiansen
"David E. Wheeler" wrote on Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:53:29 PST: >On Feb 24, 2013, at 12:57 PM, H.Merijn Brand wrote: >> =head1 TEST >> >> =head2 Return values >> >> =over 4 >> >> =item undef >> >> The return value is undefined >> >> =item 0 >> >> The return value i numerical 0 (OK). >> >> =

Re: Recent pod

2013-02-25 Thread Tom Christiansen
Russ Allbery wrote on Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:20:11 PST: >"David E. Wheeler" writes: >> This was due to this change: >> https://github.com/theory/pod-simple/commit/5a01eba83824d9f91ecfae30 >> Note that this is a warning, rather than a fatal error, though of course >> Test::Pod considers war

Re: Recent pod

2013-02-25 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Feb 25, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Allison Randal wrote: > Those are all pretty weird hacks, and make for ugly Pod. I find most Pod ugly, anyway. But I use C<> all the time in such situations. > Can the level > of strictness on =item checking be made configurable? Like, in > _ponder_paragraph_buffer,

Re: Recent pod

2013-02-25 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Feb 25, 2013, at 1:38 PM, Johan Vromans wrote: > Just what we need... more obscure trickery. > > Why not replace "=item *" by something friendly like "=bullet" ? > > Also quite stupid: > > =over 4 > > =item 1. > > First item. > > =item 1. > > Another item. > > =back > > Computer

Re: Recent pod

2013-02-25 Thread Johan Vromans
"David E. Wheeler" writes: > On Feb 25, 2013, at 9:20 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > >> Better (since it doesn't change the formatting): >> >>=item 0Z<> >> >>=item *Z<> > > I think S<> would work, too. Just what we need... more obscure trickery. Why not replace "=item *" by something frie