On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:13:46AM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> > I will take a look at Pod::Simple::HTML soon, as a replacement for the code
> > currently being used on search.cpan.org.
> >
> > Graham.
>
> Good Lord, not yet. It's not working yet. I've been working on it,
I was not expecting
> I will take a look at Pod::Simple::HTML soon, as a replacement for the code
> currently being used on search.cpan.org.
>
> Graham.
Good Lord, not yet. It's not working yet. I've been working on it,
Sean did a bunch last night, but we have NOTHING as far as L<> handling
yet.
I've got some
> the same question. Also, interested developers should look at the .t
> files, which contain hundreds of examples of Pod input and the XML output
> that it should produce.
Cool! I'm so glad we finally have full use of regression tests for POD input and
output.
> In writing Pod::Simple, I ha
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 02:29:54AM -0600, Sean M. Burke wrote:
> As I have said before, I want Pod::Simple (once it is more tested
> and is completely documented) to replace Pod::Parser, which I want
> to deprecate. I want all the important formatters and processors)
> to change from using Pod::P
Thanks Sean,
I will take a look at Pod::Simple::HTML soon, as a replacement for the code
currently being used on search.cpan.org.
Graham.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 02:29:54AM -0600, Sean M. Burke wrote:
> By popular request, I have released an underdocumented beta of my new Pod
> parser framewor
By popular request, I have released an underdocumented beta of my new Pod
parser framework. It's called Pod::Simple, and it's entering CPAN as
Pod-Simple-0.90.tar.gz right now.
If your nearest CPAN mirror doesn't have it yet, you can get it right from
here:
http://members.spinn.net/~sburke/Pod