Re: encodings in Pod::Simple

2003-07-07 Thread Sean M. Burke
At 09:12 AM 2003-07-05 -0700, Autrijus Tang wrote: On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 06:14:37PM -0800, Sean M. Burke wrote: > Oop, one more assumption I'd like to be able to make: > * Unless a Pod file starts with a BOM, the Pod processor will assume that > it's in Latin-1 or UTF8, unless/until there's an =e

Re: encodings in Pod::Simple

2003-07-06 Thread Autrijus Tang
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 06:14:37PM -0800, Sean M. Burke wrote: > Oop, one more assumption I'd like to be able to make: > > * Unless a Pod file starts with a BOM, the Pod processor will assume that > it's in Latin-1 or UTF8, unless/until there's an =encoding directive > seen. So if you're writin

encodings in Pod::Simple

2003-07-04 Thread Sean M. Burke
Oop, one more assumption I'd like to be able to make: * Unless a Pod file starts with a BOM, the Pod processor will assume that it's in Latin-1 or UTF8, unless/until there's an =encoding directive seen. So if you're writing a Pod file in any other encoding, you /must/ have an =encoding line.

encodings in Pod::Simple

2003-07-04 Thread Sean M. Burke
(I'm CCing the perl-i18n list on this, as this will interest some on the list; and I may need to pick the brains of a few people on the list.) So as I'm milling over the implementation and tests for =encoding in Pod::Simple, I'm starting to settle on some hopefully sane assumptions that Pod::