>
> So, my question now is what is a "proper" fix? I can think of a few
> alternatives:
>
> 1) Wait for PoDoFo to make a formal code change that helps my situation.
>
> 2) Continue to use a hacked PoDoFo (not a problem right now, but not
> desirable long term).
>
> 3) Extract the relevant logic fr
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:31 PM, dennis jenkins
wrote:
> Dominik,
>
> Thank you for that suggestion. The code change fixes PDFs that I
> generate myself (my small test case).
> However, it does not work with editing existing PDFs.
>
> I will study the functionality in PdfAcroForm.cpp and
Dominik,
Thank you for that suggestion. The code change fixes PDFs that I
generate myself (my small test case).
However, it does not work with editing existing PDFs.
I will study the functionality in PdfAcroForm.cpp and experiment.
Thank you very much.
ps- Why is the "NeedAppearances
