Re: POE::Session-new()

2004-11-16 Thread Rocco Caputo
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 07:02:03PM +0200, Martijn van Beers wrote: Hi, how about we deprecate POE::Session-new in favour of making -create the only way to build sessions? Apart from the fact that having two ways to do exactly the same thing means more chance for bugs to happen, it is also

Re: POE::Session-new()

2004-10-13 Thread sungo
On (10/13 19:02), Martijn van Beers wrote: Hi, how about we deprecate POE::Session-new +1 vote from me -- sungo http://eekeek.org

Re: POE::Session-new()

2004-10-13 Thread saint Marck
On (10/13 19:02), Martijn van Beers wrote: Hi, how about we deprecate POE::Session-new +1 vote from me -- sungo http://eekeek.org Seconded. ___ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com

Re: POE::Session-new()

2004-10-13 Thread Apocalypse
Martijn van Beers wrote: Hi, how about we deprecate POE::Session-new in favour of making -create the only way to build sessions? Apart from the fact that having two ways to do exactly the same thing means more chance for bugs to happen, it is also a real pain when subclassing Session. Since you

Re: POE::Session-new()

2004-10-13 Thread Arthur Bergman
I agree! Cheers Arthur - Infrastructure Manager @ Fotango Ltd +447834716919 http://www.fotango.com/ On 13 Oct 2004, at 18:25, sungo wrote: On (10/13 19:02), Martijn van Beers wrote: Hi, how about we deprecate POE::Session-new +1 vote from me -- sungo http://eekeek.org

Re: POE::Session-new()

2004-10-13 Thread Ofer Nave
deprecate POE::Session-new in favour of making -create the only way to build sessions? Apart from the fact that having two ways to do exactly the same thing means more chance for bugs to happen, it is also a real pain when subclassing Session. Since you can't sanely extend new() to accept other parameters

Re: POE::Session-new()

2004-10-13 Thread Dylan Hardison
I agree too, deprecate it. +1