yeah, that's why the "Web 2.0" makes me laugh.. didn't we have
bidirectional protocols 30 years ago?
anyway, i'd argue that HTTP *can* be used as a bidirectional protocol.
if the client sends a chunked request body with no content length, and
the server sends a chunked response body with no c
m within XUL to update the
log window? Any hints greatly appreciated!
Rutger
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:02:00 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Whoops, forgot to cc the list.
>
> David
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: David Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fe
ps, forgot to cc the list.
David
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 23, 2007 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: POE and XUL
To: Rutger Vos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The problem with the xul poco is that you can't send data back to the
browser u
Whoops, forgot to cc the list.
David
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 23, 2007 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: POE and XUL
To: Rutger Vos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The problem with the xul poco is that you can't send data back to the
Dear POE programmers,
I am attempting to write a POE program that does two things:
1. construct and manage a POE::Component::XUL application;
2. follow a growing log file.
The idea is that the log file follower sends new lines in the log to the XUL
application, to be displayed in a TextWindow X
