Named Range

2002-04-21 Thread Libin Roman
Hi,As you see I have done javadoc. If you have something specific , please tell me. What function names should I change ?please be more specific :) Waiting for Answer, Libin Roman

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8342] New: - Deleting Cells

2002-04-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8342. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Named Range

2002-04-21 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Libin Roman wrote: Hi, As you see I have done javadoc. If you have something specific , please tell me. What function names should I change ? please be more specific :) Waiting for Answer,

Re: Named Range

2002-04-21 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] I realize the rest of the formula package does not reflect those standards, it predates them, is was only there for proof of concept, and will problably be nearly completely rewritten. If you look nearly anywhere else in the src/java directory at

[VOTE] to branch or not to branch

2002-04-21 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Hi All and especially those of you who ride Kangaroos to work everyday, It occurs to me that some of the things I'm about to do are heavily HSSF-2.0 oriented and yet I'm not yet sure we'll be ready for 1.5. Everytime I think we're RealClose(tm) a Gigantic moth sized anywhere from little to

Re: [VOTE] to branch or not to branch

2002-04-21 Thread Marc
Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Hi All and especially those of you who ride Kangaroos to work everyday, It occurs to me that some of the things I'm about to do are heavily HSSF-2.0 oriented and yet I'm not yet sure we'll be ready for 1.5. Everytime I think we're RealClose(tm) a Gigantic moth sized

Re: [VOTE] to branch or not to branch

2002-04-21 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 10:47, Marc wrote: Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Hi All and especially those of you who ride Kangaroos to work everyday, It occurs to me that some of the things I'm about to do are heavily HSSF-2.0 oriented and yet I'm not yet sure we'll be ready for 1.5. Everytime I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8342] - Deleting Cells

2002-04-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8342. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [VOTE] to branch or not to branch

2002-04-21 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Marc/Glen/Rainer/Nicola/Ryan/et al: Okay with that in mind should the named ranges patch go in 1.5 or have to wait until 2.0? (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8114) The issues: * Its somewhat new and hasn't been in a development release yet, so we'd have to do another first.

Re: [VOTE] to branch or not to branch

2002-04-21 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
We've agreed to this. 1.5 is a special exception. We'll only make special exceptions in the future if we completely revamp our package structure and move to apache againwait...we can't do it again... . so 1.5 is a special exception. However our existing versioning scheme is this: 1.0.0 =

More formula experimental stuff

2002-04-21 Thread Avik Sengupta
As per my promise, here is the stuff that lets us parse integers and operators (+-*/) and brackets into RPN order. Actually the patch is in two parts. 1. o.a.p.h.r.formula.FormulaParser :- this class now completely parses a formula and returns a rpn order list of Ptgs. The rpn conversion is

cvs commit: jakarta-poi/src/documentation/images logoJanssen1.png logoJanssen2.png

2002-04-21 Thread acoliver
acoliver02/04/21 17:59:05 Added: src/documentation/images logoJanssen1.png logoJanssen2.png Log: new logos Revision ChangesPath 1.1 jakarta-poi/src/documentation/images/logoJanssen1.png Binary file 1.1

cvs commit: jakarta-poi/src/documentation/xdocs/news logocontest.xml

2002-04-21 Thread acoliver
acoliver02/04/21 18:03:09 Modified:src/documentation/xdocs/news logocontest.xml Log: new logos Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +7 -2 jakarta-poi/src/documentation/xdocs/news/logocontest.xml Index: logocontest.xml