Disadvantage:
[...]
* Traffic for passive users
Also for the active users -- it'll mean poi developers will have to
sift through user questions. Perhaps not a big deal, just something
to consider.
FWIW, I'm a very passive user and I don't mind whichever way you
decide. I would find the
Cool, as far as automated messages...
AFAIK we only have
1. Gump reports
2. Commit messages
3. Bug reports
I read all three of those when they appear on the list...
-Andy
Danny Mui wrote:
I agree with Andy's (which one? you decide!) sentiment here. We have
a few automated messages in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am facing the same issue and it is blocking.
How do i apply the patch or has this patch been integrated in the nightly or
dev build.
thanks,
raghu
I'm forwarding this to the proper place.
-
To
Sometimes the bugzilla reports have 5+ entries that can bury messages on
the list. It may introduce excess noise to users but I see your
point. POI users are diferent, they're developers. They should read
that stuff in the event they have insight on issues/bugs and pitch in.
Ok sold,
I do agree that poi users are usually developers, so a separate user and dev
lists for discussion does not make sense, so closing poi-user and moving all
discussion to poi-dev would be a good idea.
I however think that there probably should be a separate list for the default
bugzilla and cvs
I do agree that poi users are usually developers, so a separate user and dev
lists for discussion does not make sense, so closing poi-user and moving all
discussion to poi-dev would be a good idea.
I however think that there probably should be a separate list for the default
bugzilla and cvs
I do agree that poi users are usually developers, so a separate user and dev
lists for discussion does not make sense, so closing poi-user and moving all
discussion to poi-dev would be a good idea.
I however think that there probably should be a separate list for the default
bugzilla and cvs
I do agree that poi users are usually developers, so a separate user and dev
lists for discussion does not make sense, so closing poi-user and moving all
discussion to poi-dev would be a good idea.
I however think that there probably should be a separate list for the default
bugzilla and cvs
I do agree that poi users are usually developers, so a separate user and dev
lists for discussion does not make sense, so closing poi-user and moving all
discussion to poi-dev would be a good idea.
I however think that there probably should be a separate list for the default
bugzilla and cvs
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13478.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18295.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hey avik, can you post again? ;-)
Avik Sengupta wrote:
I do agree that poi users are usually developers, so a separate user and dev
lists for discussion does not make sense, so closing poi-user and moving all
discussion to poi-dev would be a good idea.
yes
I however think that there
Avik Sengupta wrote, On 25/03/2003 2.53:
I do agree that poi users are usually developers, so a separate user and dev
lists for discussion does not make sense, so closing poi-user and moving all
discussion to poi-dev would be a good idea.
I however think that there probably should be a separate
I wouldn't mind bugzilla so much if it just had a reasonable subject
line. The do not reply with a bug number really don't give you a lot
to go on. Any way we can swap to Jira?
A. Is it opensource
B. Worth the effort? (cost/benefit)
C. Are you volunteering to:
1 install it
2
14 matches
Mail list logo
