All,
Basically i have finished implementing rich text support (yaa!) but have
come across an interesting quirk. Currently the SST record will grow based
on the number of nuique strings in the file, it never colapses (unless i
am missing something), so for example if i continually update a
All,
How do we want to handle this patch for the rich text support. The patch
is quite large because it includes the pull method patch attached to bug
31906. I dont believe that this mailing list will allow me to send an
email with a file that is arround the 500K mark, so this makes reviewing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36075.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36075.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-poi has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-poi has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36075.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36075.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Definitely 3.0.
Do this:
cvs tag BEFORE_RICH
do patch
cvs commit
cvs tag AFTER_RICH
that should allow review by anyone with
cvs diff -r BEFORE_RICH -r AFTER_RICH...
-andy
Jason Height wrote:
All,
How do we want to handle this patch for the rich text support. The patch
is quite large
There should be a coalesce method. However, it shouldn't run by
default as it is probably time consuming. Many people would consider
extra filesize a happy tradeoff vs memory consumption or processor
utilization. It just depends.
It might also be good to optionally (this costs more memory)
10 matches
Mail list logo