This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-03-22/jakarta-poi.html
Buildfile: build.xml
init:
[echo]
From: Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-03-22/jakarta-poi.html
...
docs:
[java] Exception in
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-03-21/jakarta-poi.html
Buildfile: build.xml
init:
[echo]
Would this be because we don't have cocoon as a dependency of the doc
build...hummm?
I've become sold on this whole GUMP thing. I need it at work even. So um,
lets get these working ASAP and please let me know if I can help.
-Andy
On 21 Mar 2002 13:10:09 - Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-03-19/jakarta-poi.html
Buildfile: build.xml
init:
[echo]
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-03-18/jakarta-poi.html
Buildfile: build.xml
init:
[echo]
Wow, a bad day for gump. Looks like xerces is the center of the universe.
-- Glen
- Original Message -
From: Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:50 PM
Subject: [GUMP] Build Failure - Poi
From: Glen Stampoutlzis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wow, a bad day for gump. Looks like xerces is the center of the universe.
;-)
AFAIK, the POI build that failed is because it ran the script instead of the
ant target:
ant target=gump/
script name=build/
When the script is present, the ant
Ken is the Artistic License compatible with Apache?
On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 08:36, Sam Ruby wrote:
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-03-15/jakarta-poi.html
From: Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Ken is the Artistic License compatible with Apache?
I think it is.
Sam, can you help us with this?
Dependencies on code under the Artistic License are OK.
Good :-)
Now that I'm able not to break the build of FOP, Gump does
Ooops. Make broken. Sorry.
- Original Message -
From: acoliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:38 AM
Subject: Glen you forgot something WAS: Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Poi
Glen, looks like you forgot to change your example when you changed
I fixed it now...
On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 17:55, Glen Stampoutlzis wrote:
Ooops. Make broken. Sorry.
- Original Message -
From: acoliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:38 AM
Subject: Glen you forgot something WAS: Re: [GUMP] Build Failure
in the future. I'm looking forward to the day where I can
tell you I told you so.
- Sam Ruby
Marc Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/12/2002 10:12:40 AM
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:Sam Ruby/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Subject:Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Poi
Ok, I hereby invoke my right to officially say, I
Sam Ruby wrote:
Glen Stampoultzis wrote:
I assume Xalan needs to be added as a dependency in the gump build. Do I
need to supply a patch for this?
If you can do it in advance, it might save you one nag e-mail. But if
you don't I generally can figure out what is going on and clean it up for
14 matches
Mail list logo